Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 08-13-2013, 07:14 AM
 
17,501 posts, read 9,320,889 times
Reputation: 11961

Advertisements

From the Wall Street Journal ......
Washington's Latest Special Favor - Of the nation's 143 refineries, one was exempted from the EPA's ethanol mandate. Why?

Special Favors are nothing new, but it's always good to at least know who is receiving the "Favor" and why. The "Favor" is often buried in fine print in the middle of some esoteric announcement that the public doesn't generally read. The EPA announcements are just like that - boring, long and typically filled with hits on some folks and gifts to others.

This particular "rule" is the annual EPA quota that mandates how much renewable fuel (ethanol) must be blended into gasoline. It was "delayed" from last fall and just released last week. Turns out there is an exemption (waiver) for one un-named refinery out of 143 refineries in the USA. The EPA won't say who this refinery is. So -- why is this important (other than the obvious anonymous "Favor"?

This "blend rule" directly effects the price of gasoline and we get a glimpse into what the other refineries are doing because of the "blend rule". The quota for 2013 is 16.5 Billion gallons, but your can 'pay your way' out of the "rule" by purchasing "credits" from the EPA - only that ONE refinery gets out of the "rule" without having to purchase the "credits".

Quote:
The 89-page rule is dull reading, until you get to page 11. Tucked on that page is one short sentence, which reads: "EPA has approved a single small refinery/small refiner exemption for 2013, so an adjustment has been made to the standards to account for this exemption." In English: Of the nation's 143 refineries, one (and only one) lucky player somehow had the pull to win itself a free pass from this government burden. Not only that, the rest of the industry gets to pick up its slack.

This matters because for refineries to stuff ballooning amounts of ethanol into a static gas pool, they must blend it at levels of more than 10%. Since the nation's auto makers have declared they will void the warranties of cars using gas with more than 10% ethanol, refineries face lawsuits. Most have instead turned to buying federal renewable "credits" to make up for the ethanol they don't blend.

As demand for these credits skyrockets, so has the price—jumping from a few pennies a gallon last year to close to $1 a gallon today. Oil refiner Valero has said the credits could raise its cost by a stunning $750 million this year, a hit that will be passed on to consumers. PBF Energy just told investors that its disappointing second-quarter earnings were rooted in the mandate, noting that the $200 million it expects to fork over for ethanol credits this year will exceed the salaries and wages that it pays to operate all three of its refineries.
Some refineries have just lowered production to escape the "Rule" (which raises the price of gasoline), some are shipping the refined gasoline off shore (escapes the "Rule" and raises the price of gasoline), some are just shutting down if they are among the small refineries scattered around the country.

This is the kind of behind the scenes stuff that few people are aware of - the Ethanol mandates come from Congress, the Quota level comes from the EPA ..... both have proved to be detrimental and Special Favors for corn producers (often Big Farm business) and probably for a particular CongressCritter to save a small refiner in his/her State. This is the way Votes are purchased.

A growing concern for me is all these reports I've been reading about "buying credits" and "paying fines" to the Government - it adds up to Millions and Millions of dollars that go into the Black Hole of the Treasury with little accountability. Congress doesn't mandate or oversee these "fines", "credit purchases" & "waivers" - it's coming from Government Departments (like the DOJ) and Agencies (like the EPA).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-13-2013, 07:28 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,170,278 times
Reputation: 17865
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kibby View Post
A growing concern for me is all these reports I've been reading about "buying credits" and "paying fines" to the Government - it adds up to Millions and Millions of dollars that go into the Black Hole of the Treasury with little accountability. Congress doesn't mandate or oversee these "fines", "credit purchases" & "waivers" - it's coming from Government Departments (like the DOJ) and Agencies (like the EPA).
The mandates and credits are the dirty little secret of the renewable industry and can often make the subsidies look like peanuts. For example in states with net metering the power producer will often pay more for the renewable energy going into the system from people's houses than they are charging them back becsue they get a credit for it to meet mandates. Here in PA if you install a solar system you get a credit which you can then sell to the power producer.... In each case the cost of those credits is folded into the rates consumers ans business's are paying.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 08:43 AM
 
Location: San Antonio
2,817 posts, read 3,470,606 times
Reputation: 1252
there is no hope for this to change. It is all about money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: Planet earth
3,617 posts, read 1,827,230 times
Reputation: 1258
This is what the man-made global warming scam has been about all this time. Follow the money. All roads lead to Washington DC.


Walter Williams just pointed out another link with follow the money and energy: http://cnsnews.com/commentary/walter...y-manipulation
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-13-2013, 10:18 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,652,019 times
Reputation: 27720
Yes it is all about money. The EPA lives for fines.

When the smoke from the Mexican field burnings drift up to Texas we have to impose ozone action days.
The EPA counts that smoke drift as pollution in Texas and we are fined because of it.
This is an annual occurrence. The EPA doesn't care that this pollution wasn't generated by Texas; all they care is if we go over that magic number we owe them money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top