Where are all the anti war Bush haters?? (Congress, wage, arsenal)

[wutitiz]

Originally Posted by chad3

Did democrats protest the Afghanistan war? No.

Democrats only protested the Iraq war (because Iraq had nothing to do with Sept 11.)

The Bush White House told 935 documented lies about Iraq, killed 100,000+ innocent Iraqi people, and killed 1,000's of US soldiers for nothing.

Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com


When Obama tells 100's of lies to start a war, kills 100,000+ innocent people, and kills 1,000's of US soldiers for nothing, then we will complain about Obama, just like we complained about Bush.

That has got to be the most moronic 'study' ever. You can make that 936 lies, and add in Obama's name to the list, because he also claimed that Saddam had WMD in 2002.
Obama's 2002 Anti War Speech

Originally Posted by Obama's 2002 speech

He [Saddam Hussein]has repeatedly defied UN resolutions, thwarted UN inspection teams, developed chemical and biological weapons, and coveted nuclear capacity.

And you could also add Saddam's own generals to the list, since they believed that he still had WMD. I bet if we tried, we could get that number of 'false statements' up to 4 figures, perhaps more.

Historians will eventually come to regard the 'Bush lied about WMD' meme as one of the biggest idiocies of history.

[softblueyz]

Originally Posted by chad3

Did democrats protest the Afghanistan war? No.

Democrats only protested the Iraq war (because Iraq had nothing to do with Sept 11.)

The Bush White House told 935 documented lies about Iraq, killed 100,000+ innocent Iraqi people, and killed 1,000's of US soldiers for nothing.

Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com

Dems and republicans voted for the Iraq war.
Dems and republicans voted for the Afghanistan War
and
76 democrats voted to extend the war in Afghanistan:
That's My Congress | 79 House Democrats Vote To Keep Afghanistan War Going On Even Longer
When Obama tells 100's of lies to start a war, kills 100,000+ innocent people, and kills 1,000's of US soldiers for nothing, then we will complain about Obama, just like we complained about Bush.

So you're OK with the thousands of innocent people that were killed because of his love of drones and soldiers are still dying in Afghanistan. The fact that over 100,000 people died in Syria and Obama stood by and took no action is OK?

“The president does not have power under the Constitution to unilaterally authorize a military attack in a situation that does not involve stopping an actual or imminent threat to the nation,” candidate Obama

“It is always preferable to have the informed consent of Congress prior to any military action,” Obama continued.

President Obama did not seek congressional approval for his military strikes against Libya in 2011. That bombing campaign led to longtime dictator Muammar Gadhafi’s ouster.

Vice President Joe Biden, who voted for the Iraq War, agreed with Obama.

“The president has no constitutional authority to take this country to war… unless we’re attacked or unless there is proof that we are about to be attacked,” Biden said in 2007.

Biden, then a Democratic senator from Delaware, suggested presidential war-making was an impeachable offense

Obama and his team contradict past statements on war powers | The Daily Caller

The absolute height of hypocrisy coming from the President and Vice President of the United States!!!!

[RogersParkGuy]

Originally Posted by KUchief25

It appears they have gone silent. Why is that? Where are the protests? Where is the anti war crowd? Where are the front yard signs I saw? I guess nobody cares anymore?

It's quite amazing the hypocrisy of these left handed folks.

Here is the saddest part of it all. Obama sits around a table like a child at a tea party with his little world leaders he's indulging and old Hanoi John goes out behind the podium and microphone to make the US statement. I mean how ridiculous is that? Hell I bet ketchup man was in heaven as that is the stage he always wanted to be on. I'm surprised he didn't knock the damn podium over with his woody he had to be sporting at the time. Just a pathetic mess this entire administration is.

What hypocrrisy? There have been protests, and the proests are growing. Please, please, do little research next time before you put up a post like this. You'll look much less foolish.

Protests against Syria attack gather momentum - U.S. News

[wutitiz]

The fact that Democrats have worked to make military action a function of partisan whim has greatly reduced our strength in the eyes of the world. We're not back to the pre-Reagan days of being hobbled by Vietnam syndrome, but we're going in that direction.

Such perception of weakness is often the very thing that leads to war. With both SH and OBL, they saw us as fundamentally weak due to our having gone to Somalia, and cutting out when the going got tough. That was part of why both SH and OBL proceeded the way they did.

[gmagoo]

Originally Posted by wutitiz

That has got to be the most moronic 'study' ever. You can make that 936 lies, and add in Obama's name to the list, because he also claimed that Saddam had WMD in 2002.
Obama's 2002 Anti War Speech



And you could also add Saddam's own generals to the list, since they believed that he still had WMD. I bet if we tried, we could get that number of 'false statements' up to 4 figures, perhaps more.

Historians will eventually come to regard the 'Bush lied about WMD' meme as one of the biggest idiocies of history.

A lot of politicians talked tough in 1998,2002 or whenever but one man alone was responsible for evicting Hans Blix and his team of weapons inspectors. Bush lied about wmd`s? The smoking gun.
The Downing Street Memo :: What is it?

[alphamale]

They're busy filling out job applications.

[my54ford]

Originally Posted by chad3

Did democrats protest the Afghanistan war? No.

Democrats only protested the Iraq war (because Iraq had nothing to do with Sept 11.)

The Bush White House told 935 documented lies about Iraq, killed 100,000+ innocent Iraqi people, and killed 1,000's of US soldiers for nothing.

Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com


When Obama tells 100's of lies to start a war, kills 100,000+ innocent people, and kills 1,000's of US soldiers for nothing, then we will complain about Obama, just like we complained about Bush.

You do understand that your Dem gods voted for the Afghan and Iraq war too?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authori...nst_Terrorists
Iraq Resolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
lets make it a simple equation....
Yes vote + Dem = War mad whack a loon
or
Yes vote + Dem / JWB = retards duped by a moron

[alphamale]

Originally Posted by chielgirl

I guess you haven't seen my status, set over 5 months ago.

You would vote for him again in a heartbeat.

Hey....Rand Paul, Mike Lee, Ted Cruz and others are against America getting involved in war around the world.

[alphamale]

Originally Posted by ctk0p7

Probably a little too early for protests about a war that hasn't happened. I'm sure if we actually get into a war with Syria the protests will begin.

Shouldn't we protest BEFORE war?

I've called my representatives, Senators and the WH dozens of times this week.

Do the same.

[alphamale]

Originally Posted by chad3

Did democrats protest the Afghanistan war? No.

Democrats only protested the Iraq war (because Iraq had nothing to do with Sept 11.)

The Bush White House told 935 documented lies about Iraq, killed 100,000+ innocent Iraqi people, and killed 1,000's of US soldiers for nothing.

Study: Bush, aides made 935 false statements in run-up to war - CNN.com


When Obama tells 100's of lies to start a war, kills 100,000+ innocent people, and kills 1,000's of US soldiers for nothing, then we will complain about Obama, just like we complained about Bush.

Lefties forget that the dummycrats lies are one click away!

So, the following lefties are liars too.....

Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003