Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-28-2013, 06:14 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Actually no I am not, I am saying he won't call this a bailout because he doesn't want it to look like he asked for a bailout from DC.
From the searching I did Snyder prefers bankruptcy over bailout.
Snyder actually thinks a fed bailout is the wrong way to approach Detroit's problems.
And these articles go back through July.

Where did you get your info that Snyder asked for a bailout ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-28-2013, 06:51 AM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,933,885 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Doing quite well but not well enough to pay up.
The Fed had to bail out the city.
They can pay up. Part of the reason might be public image. Detroit is getting much attention. The amt is interestingly around the real amount they actually do need for current liabilities. Not the rest of that 9.1bil they are creatively keeping. Definitely could be something going on there. That whole story seems vague as well.

Remember, insolvency isn't the same definition for municipalities. Doesn't mean they can't pay, can mean they generally aren't paying. Then they get much greater leverage saving those pension funds. Which are big sources of investment revenue.

This whole pension payout story with no public documentation may prove to have quite the spin. Give good validation to freeze them for example. Certainly, can try to add validity to the whole pension focus. Will see what the headlines say. Pensions all over have been pilfered for quite awhile. Been going on for decades.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:00 AM
 
Location: Fredericktown,Ohio
7,168 posts, read 5,366,904 times
Reputation: 2922
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr View Post
They can pay up. Part of the reason might be public image. Detroit is getting much attention. The amt is interestingly around the real amount they actually do need for current liabilities. Not the rest of that 9.1bil they are creatively keeping. Definitely could be something going on there. That whole story seems vague as well.

Remember, insolvency isn't the same definition for municipalities. Doesn't mean they can't pay, can mean they generally aren't paying. Then they get much greater leverage saving those pension funds. Which are big sources of investment revenue.

This whole pension payout story with no public documentation may prove to have quite the spin. Give good validation to freeze them for example. Certainly, can try to add validity to the whole pension focus. Will see what the headlines say. Pensions all over have been pilfered for quite awhile. Been going on for decades.
Thanks for the links have not read all of them yet but working on it. That is a solid point that Detroit needs 300 million and all the sudden the federal gvt finds the money laying around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:14 AM
 
11,086 posts, read 8,545,982 times
Reputation: 6392
More bananas for the monkeys.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:16 AM
 
Location: NJ
23,558 posts, read 17,232,713 times
Reputation: 17599
Obama navigates obstacles by renaming them. Magically they go away. Like his words of iron turn into malleable lead balloons as his handlers spin his words to meet whatever the situation requires.

Obama didn't build it, it took 300M$ of taxpayer cash to bail out detroit.

Hey, JoAnn Watson is happy! except the bacon Obama delivered was made from slaughtered taxpayers and not a hog.

Detroit city councilwoman wants
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:23 AM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,933,885 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swingblade View Post
Thanks for the links have not read all of them yet but working on it. That is a solid point that Detroit needs 300 million and all the sudden the federal gvt finds the money laying around.
Your welcome. To me I am amazed people do not study the actual bookkeeping. They get to do creative things with all the various funds and accounting, much like the nutty idea that debt is valuable. LOL

It is always about the funds. The only reason govt does any of the things they do is to get a fund going and invest it. Still can't believe there is actually a senator haircare investment fund, unreal. No wonder they keep doing it. Easy pickins from the sheeple.

That same thread, I posted with Municipal BK info, has info on the actual CAFRs.
http://www.city-data.com/forum/31573535-post3.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:25 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr View Post
Your welcome. To me I am amazed people do not study the actual bookkeeping. They get to do creative things with all the various funds and accounting, much like the nutty idea that debt is valuable. LOL

It is always about the funds. The only reason govt does any of the things they do is to get a fund going and invest it. Still can't believe there is actually a senator haircare investment fund, unreal. No wonder they keep doing it. Easy pickins from the sheeple.

That same thread, I posted with Municipal BK info, has earlier on info on the actual CAFRs.
That always seems to be the way with government.
It's a NIMBY attitude towards actually sitting down and cutting/taxing to get your budget/debt back on track.

We see it at the local/state/federal level.
Because they are never punished for it..never.
Greed and corruption have taken over the country.

And the USG did sequester cuts and put people on furloughs and all of a sudden they "find" extra money not used ?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 07:44 AM
 
8,483 posts, read 6,933,885 times
Reputation: 1119
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
That always seems to be the way with government.
It's a NIMBY attitude towards actually sitting down and cutting/taxing to get your budget/debt back on track.

We see it at the local/state/federal level.
Because they are never punished for it..never.
Greed and corruption have taken over the country.

And the USG did sequester cuts and put people on furloughs and all of a sudden they "find" extra money not used ?
You always see "rainy day" funds found. Never seen them in an actual CAFR. You also do not hear your public reps speak of it. Have only seen one rep publicly discussing it.

Also that debt is an investment to them. They pass it off on the smucks. They invest in keeping people in debt.

The issue is the laws need to change and address the accounting. It is legal for them to do this. It is how they make so much money. That is because they write the rules and nobody is calling them on it. That is also why they don't draw attention to it.

Legally they get to take money from you, invest it and keep the profits. They don't have to share a dime. Then they get to do creative accounting that nobody else gets away with to make even more.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 08:00 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by CDusr View Post
You always see "rainy day" funds found. Never seen them in an actual CAFR. You also do not hear your public reps speak of it. Have only seen one rep publicly discussing it.

Also that debt is an investment to them. They pass it off on the smucks. They invest in keeping people in debt.

The issue is the laws need to change and address the accounting. It is legal for them to do this. It is how they make so much money. That is because they write the rules and nobody is calling them on it. That is also why they don't draw attention to it.

Legally they get to take money from you, invest it and keep the profits. They don't have to share a dime. Then they get to do creative accounting that nobody else gets away with to make even more.
Texas has a rainy day fund and it is spoken about quite often since 2008.
In fact there were plenty of hot debates as some officials wanted to drain it dry to close the budget gap.
Perry said no to that one; he said they could use some but not all of the rainy day fund and would have to cut to meet the budget gap.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-28-2013, 08:02 AM
 
17,440 posts, read 9,271,173 times
Reputation: 11907
Quote:
Originally Posted by dv1033 View Post
Because of the difference layers of govt. The suburbs and surrounding cities are doing well but they can't fund the City of Detroit. Just letting the city of Detroit to keep spiraling downwards is not a good policy.
It's not to responsibility of the US Taxpayer to 'bail-out' any city that faces bankruptcy due to corruption and Union pension deals. Where do we stop once we go down that road? They have to figure it out on their own and accept the medicine of their past bad decisions. Chicago is in just about as a bad a shape, do you expect us to give them a "bail out" next?

States that handle their finances and pension obligations can't be responsible for those who don't.
Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top