Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-27-2013, 06:37 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,674,911 times
Reputation: 20886

Advertisements

After Obama is out, libs will have had eight years of control. Eight years of president, eight years of senate control (we will see in 2014), and two years of congressional control. Few, if any presidents, have had such a political landscape in which they could implement thier policy.

So.................... after eight years of

lower incomes
more unemployment
lower savings
more in poverty
more on foodstamps
more homeless
more part time workers

...........................what next? More of the same policy of the previous eight years? If not, what "new" ideas will liberals have to reverse the above trend? Do you contend it will take sixteen years? Fifty years? Why did it take Reagan only three years?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2013, 06:39 AM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,212,292 times
Reputation: 1640
Obama is only a liberal when you compare him to far right lunatics, most sane and moderates don't consider him a liberal or leftist.

Doesn't matter, if Hillary runs she'll win. So get used to 4 more years
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 07:03 AM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,674,911 times
Reputation: 20886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Obama is only a liberal when you compare him to far right lunatics, most sane and moderates don't consider him a liberal or leftist.

Doesn't matter, if Hillary runs she'll win. So get used to 4 more years

You didn't answer my question. I have no doubt Hillary will win, as there are too many idiots and government dependents in the US. That is not what I asked.

We will have had EIGHT YEARS of failed policy with-

lower incomes
lower savings
more unemployed
more part time workers
more on foodstamps
fewer home owners
massive debt

What LIBERAL POLICY MEASURES will change and reverse that trend? Or will we just have more of the same and further erosion of US standards of living? Please list policies that will reverse the above trends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 07:05 AM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,212,292 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
You didn't answer my question. I have no doubt Hillary will win, as there are too many idiots and government dependents in the US. That is not what I asked.

We will have had EIGHT YEARS of failed policy with-

lower incomes
lower savings
more unemployed
more part time workers
more on foodstamps
fewer home owners
massive debt

What LIBERAL POLICY MEASURES will change and reverse that trend? Or will we just have more of the same and further erosion of US standards of living? Please list policies that will reverse the above trends.
You expect the government to increase your personal income, savings, employment, home ownership, and decrease personal debt?

Maybe you are the socialist
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 07:07 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,116,982 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
You didn't answer my question. I have no doubt Hillary will win, as there are too many idiots and government dependents in the US. That is not what I asked.

We will have had EIGHT YEARS of failed policy with-

lower incomes
lower savings
more unemployed
more part time workers
more on foodstamps
fewer home owners
massive debt

What LIBERAL POLICY MEASURES will change and reverse that trend? Or will we just have more of the same and further erosion of US standards of living? Please list policies that will reverse the above trends.

Aren't you of the mindset that the government is not here to solve your problems?

What changed?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 07:08 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,483,423 times
Reputation: 4185
Maybe math isn't your strong suit. Obama has in fact been in office 4 years 8 months. Unless you are claiming magical powers to tell what's going to happen with the economy in the next 3 years...in which case you ought to make a killing in the market.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 07:10 AM
 
8,091 posts, read 5,913,366 times
Reputation: 1578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
Obama is only a liberal when you compare him to far right lunatics, most sane and moderates don't consider him a liberal or leftist.

Doesn't matter, if Hillary runs she'll win. So get used to 4 more years
She will win and all that will come out of it is some old rich men appear to be getting spited in Capitol Hill...

Can't see the forest for the trees, can you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,483,423 times
Reputation: 4185
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Handz View Post
She will win and all that will come out of it is some old rish men appear to be getting spited in Capitol Hill...
I voted for Obama in 2008 but I doubt I'd vote for Hillary Clinton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 07:11 AM
 
Location: Beautiful Niagara Falls ON.
10,016 posts, read 12,582,425 times
Reputation: 9030
If Obama had not had to contend with the RWNJs in congress, and his ideas had been given a chance things would be very different today.

Do you know the REAL reason the RWNJs oppose Obama's ideas with an incredible insanity?????
They fear above all else, that if implemented they would WORK WELL. That is the sole reason they oppose. Just consider for a minute. If they had just let the president run with his agenda in his first term and things worked out as badly as they would have you believe then Romney would now be sitting in the Oval office. The RWNJs only agenda is the protection of the 1%. Nothing else at all matters to them. They would sink the entire nation rather than let one single simple measure through if they thought it would have a negative impact on their masters. It just makes me sick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2013, 07:12 AM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,212,292 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by djacques View Post
I voted for Obama in 2008 but I doubt I'd vote for Hillary Clinton.
When you see the 2016 GOP 3 ring circus candidates you might change your mind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top