Quote:
Originally Posted by evilnewbie
Lets be honest Ken instead of BS around... Obama WANTS to attack Syria, anything else is LESS than what he wants... what he got was LESS than what he wanted... so NO... It does not forbid Syria from MAKING chemical weapons again, all it does is once the rebels are thrown out, Syria will stockpile chemical weapons again... destroying chemical weapons accomplishes what? Jack S*^(... there is no treaty to say they can't make new ones... accomplishment?? please, don't try to lie about failures...
|
The mental gymnastics you folks go through to try and justify your paranoia are just amazing - here we have President who has sent in seal teams and other special forces into other countries when he felt the need, and used drones and smart bombs hundreds of times in Pakistan - and you somehow think that WANTS to attack Syria but feels somehow he "can't"?
What kind of logic does that make?
He he WANTED to attack Syria, he'd ATTACK Syria. He has the ability to do so and the legal authority to do so (at least for a limited period of time).
He didn't do so - hence he DIDN'T WANT TO.
That doesn't mean he WOULDN'T, but if he WANTED to, he'd simply DO IT.
Geeze!
You folks' thought processes (if they can be called that) are just BAZARRE!
Ken
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
