Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You would never approve of a teacher getting up in front of a high school class, made up to the hilt, putting on her most sexually appealing face and attitude, and then getting nude and posing for the kids, would you?
If you do, then say so. If you don't, then you have no argument with me. I don't flipping care what adults do privately, as far as wearing clothes, I do care when the people who show to teach kids have published themselves as sexual objects.
LOL She didn't pose nude at school in front of all her students, did she?
Those parents need to make sure their kids don't gain access of nudity, porn, adult magazine. If their 16/17 horny teenager boys found an adult magazine, it is solely the parents' responsibility. Don't blame others.
LOL She didn't pose nude at school in front of all her students, did she?
Those parents need to make sure their kids don't gain access of nudity, porn, adult magazine. If their 16/17 horny teenager boys found an adult magazine, it is solely the parents' responsibility. Don't blame others.
All reasonably attractive women should be banned from the teaching profession. At some point in their lives they must have been naked somewhere.
ose parents need to make sure their kids don't gain access of nudity, porn, adult magazine. If their 16/17 horny teenager boys found an adult magazine, it is solely the parents' responsibility. Don't blame others.
Again as a person that was a boy I can categorically state that was impossible 30 years ago let alone now where you can instantly pull up porn. Probably every male in that school saw a picture of her nude within minutes of hearing about it if not when they heard about it.
All reasonably attractive women should be banned from the teaching profession. At some point in their lives they must have been naked somewhere.
[and that's not acceptable!!]
not to mention every female on campus who wasn't teaching, as well as the females at the mall, in the grocery store, at McDonalds, walking down the street, etc. It's what guys do, teenage boys, middle aged guys, even old ones. Today's school districts are run by clueless, over-educated morons.
Again as a person that was a boy I can categorically state that was impossible 30 years ago let alone now where you can instantly pull up porn. Probably every male in that school saw a picture of her nude within minutes of hearing about it if not when they heard about it.
LOL She didn't pose nude at school in front of all her students, did she?
Those parents need to make sure their kids don't gain access of nudity, porn, adult magazine. If their 16/17 horny teenager boys found an adult magazine, it is solely the parents' responsibility. Don't blame others.
Blame the parents for for the misbehavior of the children, but give the teacher a pass for parading in front of their kids in a magazine.
Yeah, like I said, no ability to reason at all. You're desperately trying to justify something, and when you do that, it always shows.
Blame the parents for for the misbehavior of the children, but give the teacher a pass for parading in front of their kids in a magazine.
Yeah, like I said, no ability to reason at all. You're desperately trying to justify something, and when you do that, it always shows.
Are you saying you are desperate now? When you cannot make a point, you just personal attack?
You as the parents are not responsible for your teenage children? What do you think PG-13 mean?
Well, this teacher didn't pose nude in front of her students at school. Those kids' parents should make sure their own children won't gain access of nudity if they are so outraged.
Again, this nation is obsessed with this stupid fake outrage. You people are always offended, one way or another.
Are you saying you are desperate now? When you cannot make a point, you just personal attack?
You as the parents are not responsible for your teenager children? What do you think PG-13 mean?
Oh, I made my point. I'm just pointing out your obvious behavior. And, the fact that you can't generate a coherent argument, is even more important.
THere is no functional difference between posing sexually in public during the summer before you start teaching... And doing it in class, other than the shock value.
Every argument so far has consisted of trying to excuse it using weak logic or just plain silly excuses.
I have a far more cogent question.
What can a teacher NOT do that you'd insist she be fired for if it was done outside of her current contract?
Blame the parents for for the misbehavior of the children, but give the teacher a pass for parading in front of their kids in a magazine.
Yeah, like I said, no ability to reason at all. You're desperately trying to justify something, and when you do that, it always shows.
What is your problem with the human body? We all have one even kids do, and it is nothing to be ashamed of...It takes religion to cause that kind of shame, guilt and prudishness.....Haven't you noticed that the more religious the person or society is the more prudish they are?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
