Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Presidents are selected not elected. It's all controlled people need to learn what is really going on.
This time around the NeoCons, the establishment controllers didn't have a chance because they messed up really bad with George Warmonger. What better way to trick people with a fresh new face the chosen Obama?
This is somewhat true... When Obama said he was related to Dick Cheney it all made sense.
I'm somewhat of a conspiracy theorist and it's hilarious hearing the GOP talk about Obama like he is a liberal when he has pretty much followed the same blueprint W had in place when it comes to war.
She's still out there. Did anyone catch her act with Megyn Kelly the other day? Even Ms. Kelly was having a hard time a) understanding the chopped word salad of the day and b) getting Ms. P to shush up long enough to hear a follow-up question.
And no, guys, you can't claim that it was 'edited' to make Ms. P look bad. It was on Fox.
Almost everything she says has already been said by someone else. She regurgitates things that sound important or profound; she has never had an original thought in her life.
When she uses the word "also," you just know that some jumbled, memorized talking point is coming. I honestly don't know why Fox continues inviting her on the show. She does them no favors.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 24 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,560 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6042
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHurricaneKid
The thing about the Bush presidency was that it heavily involved Cheney. At the very least he'd be slightly better than Bush, and without the Cheney influence, (if he picked someone better than Palin)
However, in retrospects, Obama turned out to be W. Bush 2.0 in ways much worse than W.
I think it's amazing how politicians are so different from the people you see them as before and during the campaign for Presidency.
I would love for someone to actually take some time and explain the bold and not just make a generalization with nothing to back it up.
He would have had a much better chance at winning.
The dems would still have held the House and Senate and McCain would have said, the people have spoken and reelected the dems to control the Congress, so he would just have to go along with whatever Reid and Pelosi wanted to do. John "Me Give Up" McCain would have been rolled by the dems, he'd have gone along, to get along.
Well, no matter what you believe, even if those voters are exactly what you say they are, the Republicans are on the losing side and headed for another fail.
Trying to justify getting your butthurt makes no difference in the fact that a low-information vote counts for just as much as a high-information vote. Maybe those voters aren't as low-info as you think.
For sure, getting surly won't change any minds.
Republicans still have control of the House. Even with the low-information voters.
You seem to think only liberals want "free handouts". How about the south and their free handouts and low information voters. They are mostly Republicans, right. Well of course they are.
Most of the south did not vote for Obama, therefore, they were not low-information voters!
I have no problem with those who need government aid as long as it's legitimate.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.