Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Touche! But what I really want to know is if this is such a good law why did they force us to buy it? Another thing maybe I can buy one of Mwongo's Yugo's with my 2500 dollar savings
wait, you want to PAY $2500 for a yugo? did you vote for obama twice?jk
It's like requiring State Farm to only sell full coverage policies with rental car coverage, roadside assistance and other bells & whistles included. Sure, it's "better" coverage, but maybe you were doing fine with your liability only policy on your paid-for 1998 Honda Accord that you only drive on weekends.
Yeah. This is the issue I have with the current situation of it. Take single women with no kids for instance, they wont need prostate examinations, they still have to pay for them on their plans through Obamacare. Obviously, single men have much more coverage they now need to pay for they wont even use. I don't know why this was something the public needed and haven't heard a good enough argument for it.
Yeah. This is the issue I have with the current situation of it. Take single women with no kids for instance, they wont need prostate examinations, they still have to pay for them on their plans through Obamacare. Obviously, single men have much more coverage they now need to pay for they wont even use. I don't know why this was something the public needed and haven't heard a good enough argument for it.
It's part of the plan to level the field, to re-distribute 'wealth'; it's to help pay for Obamacare. Sort of like a "one size fits all" sweater. As one dissapointed woman said on TV, talking about having lost her coverage:
"My taxes will subsidize Obama's coverage, but I don't get any subsidy; that makes me angry."
Any wonder people are angry. This thing is unraveling and our President has lost his charm and all his credibility. The suit is empty after all.
It's part of the plan to level the field, to re-distribute 'wealth'; it's to help pay for Obamacare. Sort of like a "one size fits all" sweater. As one dissapointed woman said on TV, talking about having lost her coverage:
"My taxes will subsidize Obama's coverage, but I don't get any subsidy; that makes me angry."
Any wonder people are angry. This thing is unraveling and our President has lost his charm and all his credibility. The suit is empty after all.
I can say his charm never worked on me. I saw through the front somehow.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
