Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Please tell me how much all of this money affected your vote? Who did it force you to vote for?
It affects the media and how people get their information. It's not about forcing you to vote for someone, it's about the misinformation from both side that is influencing people's votes.
It affects the media and how people get their information. It's not about forcing you to vote for someone, it's about the misinformation from both side that is influencing people's votes.
Obama lied when he said that if you liked your insurance you can keep it, period. That wasn't about money. That lie didn't influence votes? How is it solving anything by putting restrictions on only one side of the equation?
Everything isn't a lie either. Many times the money is spent on an alternative opinion. Why is it that only politicians should be the ones stating their opinions but others shouldn't be able to?
Obama lied when he said that if you liked your insurance you can keep it, period. That wasn't about money. That lie didn't influence votes? How is it solving anything by putting restrictions on only one side of the equation?
Everything isn't a lie either. Many times the money is spent on an alternative opinion. Why is it that only politicians should be the ones stating their opinions but others shouldn't be able to?
What is the relevance of this to the OP or my reply? Just had to get an Obama jab in?
What is the relevance of this to the OP or my reply? Just had to get an Obama jab in?
The argument took the assumption that this money was used to create lies that influence people. First, there wasn't a single example shown, it was simply a case of guilt based upon assumptions.
So if the problem is lies used to influence people, why is it only a problem with this?
Second, I asked the question why it is that it's somehow O.K. to allow only one side of the equation to lie with no one to challenge the lies?
ANd just like in the other thread...the koch brother will be brought up...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
