Here's What The Satanist Monument Will Look Like In OKC (states, support)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Well "Satanism" is nothing more than anti-Christianity, so I don't see how that would be possible.
Who are you to tell others what they believe, or how they practice their faith? Maybe if EVERYONE kept their religion to themselves crap like this monument thing wouldn't happen. But nooooooo Christians just have to have their religious stuff on government property. So, if we are now allowing religious displays, then any and all religious displays should be allowed. YOU don't get to decide what is or is not a religion just because you personally don't like it.
Well "Satanism" is nothing more than anti-Christianity, so I don't see how that would be possible.
Is not Christianity nothing more than anti-Satanism?
If Christians are allowed to use public land to spread their religious propaganda, then every established religion has that exact same right, or none of them do. You cannot have it both ways. Pick one.
Isn't interesting that it seems a majority of liberals seem to love idea of erecting a Satan(who personifies evil) monument.
It tells me a lot about liberals in general for who they really are.
Isn't interesting that it seems a majority of liberals seem to love idea of erecting a Satan(who personifies evil) monument.
It tells me a lot about liberals in general for who they really are.
Yup, the amount of respect i lost for so many "liberal" on this thread is astonishing
Isn't interesting that it seems a majority of liberals seem to love idea of erecting a Satan(who personifies evil) monument.
It tells me a lot about liberals in general for who they really are.
You do realize that the Church of Satan doesn't actually worship Satan/the Devil, don't you?
You do realize that the Church of Satan doesn't actually worship Satan/the Devil, don't you?
But if they did that would be fine, too, in the context of this thread.
The problem isn't a bunch of nutcases trying to get publicity, the problem is a government approving one religion over another, regardless WHERE that "other" came from.
As has been noted by more than one of those dastardly "liberals" in prior posts, what's good for the goose is good for the gander - get rid of ALL religious monuments on government property or allow ALL.
And, as I and at least one other noted, a "Freedom of Religion" park might actually be a REAL Good Thing for the state, for the country, and for a true example of religious tolerance for the rest of the world to see.
But if they did that would be fine, too, in the context of this thread.
The problem isn't a bunch of nutcases trying to get publicity, the problem is a government approving one religion over another, regardless WHERE that "other" came from.
As has been noted by more than one of those dastardly "liberals" in prior posts, what's good for the goose is good for the gander - get rid of ALL religious monuments on government property or allow ALL.
And, as I and at least one other noted, a "Freedom of Religion" park might actually be a REAL Good Thing for the state, for the country, and for a true example of religious tolerance for the rest of the world to see.
By George, I think you've got it...
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
