Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 02-23-2014, 09:22 AM
 
Location: midwest
1,594 posts, read 1,413,071 times
Reputation: 970

Advertisements

This is the problem with so called "debates" about 9/11.

Most OPs on the subject focus on some limited aspect and demonstrate the bias of the poster. [MOD CUT]
Quote:
Most people find that a lot easier to believe than a conspiracy involving hundreds of willing participants and hundreds of pounds of burning thermite that magically melted away the superstructure of the building without giving off any heat or smoke.

It would seem the theory that spawned this pointless debate has been debunked.
http://www.city-data.com/forum/33591768-post1048.html

This poster talked about Occam's Razor as though he was being logical and now talks about what is easier for people to believe. That is how most people treat Occam's Razor but they also throw out facts they regard as inconvenient to their beliefs. The true application of Occam's Razor must account for all of the facts and what people find easy to believe is irrelevant.

But I think that 9/11 has become a different order of problem. David Chandler teaches high school physics and is apparently on the side of so called "Truthers". But when has he ever tried to explain the physics of skyscrapers by discussing how steel and concrete must be distributed down the buildings so they can hold themselves up against gravity?

Talking about Occam's Razor without settling that is pretty absurd for people in the nation that put men on the Moon. But all of the people talking about False Flags and Operation Northwoods are just as ridiculous.

However our so called "scientists" and "engineers" have put themselves in a peculiar position by not resolving this by now. Maybe that is more important than any real conspiracies. Because if the physics dictates that there had to some conspiracy beyond the 19 Arabs then scientists should have figured it out in 2002. So if they did and remained silent that is another problem. Our scientific educational system has to deal with real physics no matter what the majority of dummies find "easier to believe".

psik

Last edited by Ibginnie; 02-23-2014 at 10:44 AM.. Reason: discussing moderation

 
Old 02-23-2014, 09:35 AM
 
13,305 posts, read 7,876,816 times
Reputation: 2144
There are unknown unknowns, known unknowns, and unknown knowns, the last two of which are, quite possibly, KNOWN.

Eat it!
 
Old 02-23-2014, 09:43 AM
 
Location: midwest
1,594 posts, read 1,413,071 times
Reputation: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyperthetic View Post
There are unknown unknowns, known unknowns, and unknown knowns, the last two of which are, quite possibly, KNOWN.

Eat it!
I thought "science" was about figuring out unknowns.

But there are also excuses, and stupid excuses, and lame excuses.

And that does not even mention "lies" and the just plain "stupid".

psik
 
Old 02-23-2014, 09:44 AM
 
Location: Poshawa, Ontario
2,982 posts, read 4,103,309 times
Reputation: 5622
Actually, the thread closed because there wasn't anything constructive coming out of it. Seriously... Who really wants to waste their time debating with crazy?

Thanks for using my final post in the last 9/11 thread to start this one. It's pretty much all that needs to be said on the subject.

Last edited by Annuvin; 02-23-2014 at 09:57 AM..
 
Old 02-23-2014, 10:14 AM
 
13,305 posts, read 7,876,816 times
Reputation: 2144
Funny how demolishers are so good at stonewalling.
 
Old 02-23-2014, 10:26 AM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,974,506 times
Reputation: 2177
One of the hallmarks of a good fiction writer, is that he explores all the logical branches of his plot and closes them off in a way that doesn't leave one questioning the device that closes them off.

Which means that conspiracy theorists are very bad fiction writers

It would be plausible to have a bunch of people use thermite and planes to fake something.

It would not be plausible to get all those people (and all the ones who contributed to creating the conspiracy) to keep silent. It would involve the coordination of a large array of people, to get someone in authority to pull this off. And, then to have not a single one of them ever leak it, that would be a miracle.

There, of course, are other theories as to WHY someone would want to do it, but in the end, the theories raise far more questions than they answer. Like, why would the president have the wife of a long term friend on a plane die? To what end?

Those who pen these things forget those sub-plots and that's what makes them such bad fiction writers. When asked, they imply that these people have hearts of stone and are unbelievably cold and calculating with clear and unfailing strategy and plots to achieve some end. Yet, as we saw, Bush was not. He was a decent and very caring person, who was personally extremely affected by the pain of those he didn't even know.

Sadly, the conspiracy types are terrible fiction writers - which is probably why they aren't widely published authors and rich.
 
Old 02-23-2014, 10:37 AM
 
Location: midwest
1,594 posts, read 1,413,071 times
Reputation: 970
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post
One of the hallmarks of a good fiction writer, is that he explores all the logical branches of his plot and closes them off in a way that doesn't leave one questioning the device that closes them off.

Which means that conspiracy theorists are very bad fiction writers

It would be plausible to have a bunch of people use thermite and planes to fake something.

It would not be plausible to get all those people (and all the ones who contributed to creating the conspiracy) to keep silent. It would involve the coordination of a large array of people, to get someone in authority to pull this off. And, then to have not a single one of them ever leak it, that would be a miracle.
This goes directly to the physics versus conspiracy issue. Could the portion of the north tower above the impact zone fall and destroy everything below the impact zone in less than 26 seconds or not?

That is a physics question not a conspiracy question. If the physics says it could not happen just from the fall then how much people doubt the possibility of a conspiracy being kept quiet is irrelevant. It just means that there are groups within this culture that do not conform to the norm which do not advertise their existence.

So what is wrong with having accurate distribution of mass data regardless of anyone's beliefs about conspiracies?

psik
 
Old 02-23-2014, 10:38 AM
 
13,305 posts, read 7,876,816 times
Reputation: 2144
Quote:
Originally Posted by pnwmdk View Post

Sadly, the conspiracy types are terrible fiction writers - which is probably why they aren't widely published authors and rich.
Truth is stranger than fiction, eh?
 
Old 02-23-2014, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,492 posts, read 26,605,052 times
Reputation: 8971
Back on topic- thanks psik.

Good thread.
 
Old 02-23-2014, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Poshawa, Ontario
2,982 posts, read 4,103,309 times
Reputation: 5622
Quote:
Originally Posted by psikeyhackr View Post
This goes directly to the physics versus conspiracy issue. Could the portion of the north tower above the impact zone fall and destroy everything below the impact zone in less than 26 seconds or not?
Apparently it can, as we have all seen on the footage that was recorded that day. The destruction of the towers and the length of time they took to collapse did not occur outside the laws of physics.

Of course, you could just be insinuating the collapse of the WTC was some kind of hologram. It wouldn't surprise me in the least given some of the other crazy allegations made during this ridiculous discussion.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:11 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top