Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why do some Democrats require this "pro-business" qualifier? This also is not a partisan thing as Democrats have often referred to themselves as "pro-business." Does pro-business assume, then, that there are anti-business Democrats? Why would any Democrat be anti-business? Why aren't there "pro-business" republicans?
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 23 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,552 posts, read 16,542,682 times
Reputation: 6039
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan
Why do some Democrats require this "pro-business" qualifier? This also is not a partisan thing as Democrats have often referred to themselves as "pro-business." Does pro-business assume, then, that there are anti-business Democrats? Why would any Democrat be anti-business? Why aren't there "pro-business" republicans?
Its a label, like pro-life and pro-choice, even though there are very few people who agree that abortion should be completely banned in all cases or completely legal in all cases.
The label separates you from others, thats it. Its moronic.
I always thought it was because the GOP successfully tarred Democrats as "anti-business," the same way they convinced the public at large that "Liberal" translated to "godless unpatriotic vermin" starting in Reagan's day. So Dems, who used to suck at managing PR, were forced to label themselves "pro-business" to counter that narrative once it was established, instead of fighting back right from the start.
Some of the questions are borderline 'false dilemma' for me. For example, I'm all for legalization of drugs, but not if the taxpayer is required to underwrite the health care costs caused by drug use. Given that we are, I voted no to legalization.
Taxpayers shell out $52,000 a year to maintain the home of Black History Month founder Carter Woodson. Yet the tiny, dilapidated row house in northwest Washington D.C., with a "No Trespassing" sign and iron bars blocking the front door and windows hasn’t seen a visitor in the seven years since the National Park Service bought it for $2.1 million and designated it a National Historic Site
I'm a lefty and I get called a socialist all the time. It comes with the territory.
I'm very pro-capitalism... but as soon as I advocate for more fair taxation, a better minimum wage, and tighter environmental regulations.. I get brained an anti-business, socialist, Marxist, communist, Obama-backing, <insert insult>.
St. Reagan just destroyed this country in so many ways. That man truly left a legacy for future generations
Why do some Democrats require this "pro-business" qualifier? This also is not a partisan thing as Democrats have often referred to themselves as "pro-business." Does pro-business assume, then, that there are anti-business Democrats? Why would any Democrat be anti-business? Why aren't there "pro-business" republicans?
Where???? I have not seen that species! Maybe once on National Geo!
I always thought it was because the GOP successfully tarred Democrats as "anti-business," the same way they convinced the public at large that "Liberal" translated to "godless unpatriotic vermin" starting in Reagan's day. So Dems, who used to suck at managing PR, were forced to label themselves "pro-business" to counter that narrative once it was established, instead of fighting back right from the start.
Ronnie is sooo 80's - today we just point to posts on C-D to prove that liberals are anti-business godless vermin!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.