Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:17 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,683,781 times
Reputation: 4254

Advertisements

I'm old enough to remember the non-stop news reports during Reagan's presidency, homelessness and poverty, and hunger were on the TV almost nightly.

So here we are in our fifth year of a stagnant economy and even with a 50 year high in poverty in the US, the media is staying away from reporting of those struggling in poverty.

Are Americans going about their busy lives, oblivious to the plight of the poor? Or do we mollify our concerns by throwing cake crumbs at the poor with unemployment extensions and expanding Medicaid, Food Stamps, SSDI and ACA subsides?

Have we made it permissible to ignore plight of the poor, because we provided enough of a social welfare subsistence, so that the poor can hang out there on the ragged edge, sort like a person in a comma on life support?

  • Nationally, median household income decreased by 1.3% between 2010 and 2011, from $51,144 to $50,502. While the majority of states reported a decrease in median household income, 14 states reported increases.
  • Between 2010 and 2011, the national poverty rate increased from 15.3% to 15.9%. This represents an almost 5% increase in the number of persons living in poverty; more than 48 million people were living in poverty in 2011.
  • In 2011, more than 6.5 million households were spending more than 50% of their income for housing expenses, which was a 5.5% increase from 2010.
Median income from 2010-2011 decreased by 1.3% but we were spending 5.5% more on housing expenses. Total median income since 2008 has fallen by 4.1%.

National Alliance to End Homelessness: The State of Homelessness in America 2013
Median Household Income, 2007 to 2011

US Poverty 2012
  • In 2012, 46.5 million people (15.0 percent) were in poverty.
  • In 2012, 26.5 million (13.7 percent) of people ages 18-64 were in poverty.
  • In 2012, 16.1 million (21.8 percent) children under the age of 18 were in poverty.
  • In 2012, 3.9 million (9.1 percent) seniors 65 and older were in poverty.
  • The overall poverty rate according to the Supplemental Poverty Measure is 16.1%, as compared with the official poverty rate of 15.1%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:20 AM
 
Location: SF Bay Area
12,287 posts, read 9,827,388 times
Reputation: 6509
The media doesn't talk about this because it would make the democrats and Obama look bad.

Just as how we never hear about the war protestors after 2008 or closing gitmo, or repealing the patriot act etc.

It is just further proof that democrats and republicans are cut from the same cloth and both sides inact the same policies and the lemmings on both side follow their party leaders and bash the other party without a single critical thought of their own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:22 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,722,740 times
Reputation: 22474
The homeless go away any time there is a democrst in the White House. The media stops caring about them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:31 AM
 
Location: San Francisco born/raised - Las Vegas
2,819 posts, read 2,113,998 times
Reputation: 1905
The said reflects poorly towards all administrations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:34 AM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,408,756 times
Reputation: 4025
We don't talk about it because the 1% control the media and the government. You get to being the 1% by ensuring that the 99% have a lot less than you.

There is no reason to uplift the poor, because uplifting the poor makes the wealthy less wealthy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:36 AM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,399,838 times
Reputation: 8672
Look, I've lived in lots of places with homeless folks.

Most are either mentally ill, dropouts, or someone who is on bad drugs.

Just yesterday I found a mom and dad here at Walmart asking for a hand out from the cars with their daughters there.

I know lots of folks, even some of my family, who live in government housing, have food stamps, and get other assistance.

Few people are forced to be homeless. They may feel forced, but it is their own laziness or inability to ask for help that generally lands them there.

Start hospitalizations of the mentally ill again and the homeless rate would plummet
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:36 AM
 
30,075 posts, read 18,678,343 times
Reputation: 20894
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
I'm old enough to remember the non-stop news reports during Reagan's presidency, homelessness and poverty, and hunger were on the TV almost nightly.

So here we are in our fifth year of a stagnant economy and even with a 50 year high in poverty in the US, the media is staying away from reporting of those struggling in poverty.

Are Americans going about their busy lives, oblivious to the plight of the poor? Or do we mollify our concerns by throwing cake crumbs at the poor with unemployment extensions and expanding Medicaid, Food Stamps, SSDI and ACA subsides?

Have we made it permissible to ignore plight of the poor, because we provided enough of a social welfare subsistence, so that the poor can hang out there on the ragged edge, sort like a person in a comma on life support?

  • Nationally, median household income decreased by 1.3% between 2010 and 2011, from $51,144 to $50,502. While the majority of states reported a decrease in median household income, 14 states reported increases.
  • Between 2010 and 2011, the national poverty rate increased from 15.3% to 15.9%. This represents an almost 5% increase in the number of persons living in poverty; more than 48 million people were living in poverty in 2011.
  • In 2011, more than 6.5 million households were spending more than 50% of their income for housing expenses, which was a 5.5% increase from 2010.
Median income from 2010-2011 decreased by 1.3% but we were spending 5.5% more on housing expenses. Total median income since 2008 has fallen by 4.1%.

National Alliance to End Homelessness: The State of Homelessness in America 2013
Median Household Income, 2007 to 2011

US Poverty 2012
  • In 2012, 46.5 million people (15.0 percent) were in poverty.
  • In 2012, 26.5 million (13.7 percent) of people ages 18-64 were in poverty.
  • In 2012, 16.1 million (21.8 percent) children under the age of 18 were in poverty.
  • In 2012, 3.9 million (9.1 percent) seniors 65 and older were in poverty.
  • The overall poverty rate according to the Supplemental Poverty Measure is 16.1%, as compared with the official poverty rate of 15.1%

The same thing happened in the Clinton administration. The homeless problem seemed to just evaporate from the media, only to reappear when Bush II was president.

Don't worry- they will start reporting again if and when there is a conservative in the White House.

The anti-war protesters also wake up during conservative administrations and start protesting again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:37 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,683,781 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by shooting4life View Post
The media doesn't talk about this because it would make the democrats and Obama look bad.

Just as how we never hear about the war protestors after 2008 or closing gitmo, or repealing the patriot act etc.

It is just further proof that democrats and republicans are cut from the same cloth and both sides inact the same policies and the lemmings on both side follow their party leaders and bash the other party without a single critical thought of their own.
Then again, this forum does not really give poverty much discussion either.

Our congress and president seem to wash their hands of the issue after some band-aid legislation, like extending unemployment or proclaiming K-12 schools should serve breakfast.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,479 posts, read 59,805,597 times
Reputation: 24863
The homeless and destitute don't have enough money to support the advertisers sponsoring the news shows or papers. These people have no commercial value and can be ignored.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-20-2014, 09:41 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,683,781 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
The same thing happened in the Clinton administration. The homeless problem seemed to just evaporate from the media, only to reappear when Bush II was president.

Don't worry- they will start reporting again if and when there is a conservative in the White House.

The anti-war protesters also wake up during conservative administrations and start protesting again.
I don't remember Romney running on a platform to specifically battle homelessness and poverty either.

Creating jobs and growing the economy do go hand in hand with driving down poverty, so maybe the politicians should phrase their agenda that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:45 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top