Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,301 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper 88 View Post
So, if I am following you correctly, we should teach children sex ed because we have one of the highest unwanted pregnancy rates in the civilized world, and bad things like disease can happen if you don't practice safe sex, right? But, you think a trip to the gun range, which would teach kids that guns are not a toy and teach them how to safely handle them, is a bad idea, even though this country has one of the highest gun fatality rates in the civilized world?

How is that logic consistent?
Children are born with the equipment they need for sex like it or not, if a parent wants to buy a gun let them take responsibility and teach their children rather than devote a field trip. All for gun safety as there are a lot of fools out there just not at a the expense of education.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:37 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,301 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
Teaching kids about adjusting sights and how it impacts the bullet impact provides a great application of geometry and trig. Understanding bullet drop over distance, an excellent example of physics in action. Recoil? Force and momentum.

I'd have to say all of that is more useful than say looking at old paintings, let alone the junk that passes for "modern art".
Shooting a gun and adjusting to hit a target is not math anymore than a basketball player is using math when he takes a shot. Art is already part of the curriculum that benefit students in many ways, very little to gain by going to a range.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:38 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceece View Post
It's not a controversy and nobody seems to care, even on CD. A first?
You cared enough to post an off topic comment. Why is that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:40 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Children are born with the equipment they need for sex like it or not, if a parent wants to buy a gun let them take responsibility and teach their children rather than devote a field trip. All for gun safety as there are a lot of fools out there just not at a the expense of education.
Yes like I said a ways back this is a parents job not the school.........but many let the school raise their kids nowdays.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:46 PM
 
Location: Long Island
57,301 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Yes like I said a ways back this is a parents job not the school.........but many let the school raise their kids nowdays.
I agree with you, now that has to be a first.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:48 PM
 
29,407 posts, read 22,009,955 times
Reputation: 5455
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I agree with you, now that has to be a first.
LOL........many of us agree on things it appears. We shoot the sheet though.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Where it's cold in winter.
1,074 posts, read 758,238 times
Reputation: 241
Great! Kids should have all kinds of experiences and exposure to sports of varying kinds. Archery could be good too.

Shooting sports are part of the 4-H program. Why not part of a school program?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:55 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,142 posts, read 10,713,172 times
Reputation: 9799
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Shooting a gun and adjusting to hit a target is not math anymore than a basketball player is using math when he takes a shot. Art is already part of the curriculum that benefit students in many ways, very little to gain by going to a range.
You couldn't be more wrong. As I said before, if you have ever fired at a target 200 yards away then you have at least subconsciously used practical geometry. And if you've fired at 500+ yards, you've more than likely done that geometry consciously, either with a calculator or on paper. Talk to someone who went through the Marine Corps Reconnaissance program and ask them if they could have passed without geometry and at least rudimentary physics.

As for basketball, yes, it does require at least a basic knowledge of the fundamentals of geometry, whether it's taught formally or acquired through practical application.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:56 PM
 
Location: Where it's cold in winter.
1,074 posts, read 758,238 times
Reputation: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
Okay. I think the time would be better spent on academics, but it's their choice.
Okay, so let's eliminate all high school sports. Football, basketball, baseball, all athletics. Their time is better spent on academics, according to you. Right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2014, 05:59 PM
 
Location: Jacksonville, FL
11,142 posts, read 10,713,172 times
Reputation: 9799
Quote:
Originally Posted by KUchief25 View Post
Yes like I said a ways back this is a parents job not the school.........but many let the school raise their kids nowdays.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
I agree with you, now that has to be a first.
I agree that it should be a parent's job to teach firearms safety. That being said, there are too many people out there who are irrationally afraid of guns and wouldn't even be in the same room with one, much less teach their children about the responsible use of firearms. "Guns are bad, mmmkay" is not a responsible way to teach firearms safety.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top