Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-10-2014, 01:48 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Which is not the one I responded to.

Furthermore, the cost of the Wall Street bailout can't be attributed to Bush, as it was Obama's baby:
Obama claims credit for the Wall Street bailout bill - CNN

...giving nearly $1 Trillion of taxpayer money to the banksters while millions of main street Americans lost their homes and were financially devastated.
You responded to both.

LOL at it cant be attributed to Bush. You are playing yourself now and it isnt even funny. it wasnt "Obama's Baby". And even if he had proposed it, President Bush is the one who signed it.

Are you saying he didnt have the power to send it back if he didnt agree with it ? Are you saying President Obama was both Senator and President Back in September of 2008 ??
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-10-2014, 01:50 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You responded to both.
I only ever quoted the first. You know that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 01:53 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I only ever quoted the first. You know that.
No you quoted both.

So you either neglected to read my whole post (willful ignorance), or you are playing dumb,'

both are bad as one shows I did indeed make that argument and you simply did not read it, the other shows you are lying.

So either admit you are lying, or say you were wrong as you simply didnt read it.

your choice.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 01:56 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
No you quoted both.
I've always only quoted your post with the following stated parameter: "when ... took office"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 01:57 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
I've always only quoted your post with the following stated parameter: "when ... took office"
No you didnt. You quoted the second one as well. And i quoted your response on the last page .Go back and read.

Last edited by dsjj251; 04-10-2014 at 02:15 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 02:02 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
No you didnt you quoted the second one as well, and i quoted you on the last page when you did it go back and read.
That's after I corrected your errors. You backtracked and then tried to claim you were talking about something other than what you stated in your first post.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 02:03 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Just give it up. We all know Obama is the highest national debt accruing president of all time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 02:14 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 24 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,558 posts, read 16,548,014 times
Reputation: 6041
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
That's after I corrected your errors. You backtracked and then tried to claim you were talking about something other than what you stated in your first post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by InformedConsent View Post
Just give it up. We all know Obama is the highest national debt accruing president of all time.
I never back tracked, you did.

My numbers lined up directly with what I stated.You simply argued that President Obama should be held responsible for all of the debt in 2009, you also stated that i should add in the estimated debt of 2014.

You then back tracked and tried to claim that i never made a Fiscal year argument by saying I said "when he took office", once you found out you were wrong, you then back tracked again and claimed you never responded to that specific comment, Which you did respond to.

You have done nothing but change your argument, and each time you have been proven wrong.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 02:20 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,455,656 times
Reputation: 6541


The dollar amounts are in trillions. Also, during calendar year 2001 the GOP controlled the Senate from January through May, and after Senator "Jumpin" Jim Jeffords defected from the GOP to side with the Democrats, it gave the Democrats the majority in the Senate from June through December of that calendar year. Democrats continued to control the Senate during calendar year 2002 until January 2003.

It is very obvious that neither party is fiscally responsible, but by far the most egregious are the Democrats spending more than twice the revenues.

It should also be noted that budgets are enacted during the calendar year prior to the year they go into effect. Hence, the Republican controlled Congress in 2000 passed the budget for Fiscal Year 2001, which actually began on October 1, 2000. The Republican controlled Congress in 2006 passed the budget for Fiscal Year 2007, which actually began on October 1, 2006. The Democrat controlled Congress in 2010 passed the budget for Fiscal Year 2011, which actually began on October 1, 2010. etc., etc.

Last edited by Glitch; 04-10-2014 at 02:38 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-10-2014, 02:25 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,026 posts, read 44,840,107 times
Reputation: 13714
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
I never back tracked, you did.
Yes, you did. You went from "when ... took office" to "Fiscal Year" after your wrong numbers were corrected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top