Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-21-2014, 04:29 PM
 
17,624 posts, read 17,682,949 times
Reputation: 25696

Advertisements

12 states ban sodomy a decade after court ruling | KATC.com | Acadiana-Lafayette, Louisiana
I'm sad that my state of Louisiana still has this. By the legal definition of sodomy, I'm a criminal. Anal and oral sex are defined as sodomy. Basicly, the only legal sex is penis to vagina sex. All other sex is illegal. So, by legal definition, are you guilty of sodomy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-21-2014, 04:32 PM
 
17,624 posts, read 17,682,949 times
Reputation: 25696
Guess the poll doesn't work with iPhone so here are the choices
1. Hell yeah, I'm a repeat offender!
2. Of course not, I'm Sandra Dee
3. I'm still not sure.

For the record, "GUILTY!!"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2014, 04:51 PM
 
Location: University City, Philadelphia
22,632 posts, read 14,945,990 times
Reputation: 15935
The Louisiana law, along with those in the other 11 states, were declared unconstitutional by the US Supreme Court and are therefore null and void. They can not be enforced.

These states are being silly. They technically have a law on the books that have no force or legitimacy and cannot be cited. It's like a last ditch childish way to "save face."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2014, 05:00 PM
 
Location: San Francisco
8,982 posts, read 10,463,986 times
Reputation: 5752
It's also so they can start enforcing them the very instant some future Supreme Court decides to reverse Lawrence v Texas. Because Big Gubmint is wrong and evil and wrong, unless two consenting unrelated adults are ****ing **** or having **** *** in the privacy of their own home, and then it's SEND IN THE SWAT TEAM!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2014, 06:29 PM
 
5,365 posts, read 6,339,276 times
Reputation: 3360
These laws are archaic and a great violation of the personal freedom. America has is no place for such a violation of human rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2014, 06:35 PM
 
45,227 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24985
Quote:
Originally Posted by CravingMountains View Post
These laws are archaic and a great violation of the personal freedom. America has is no place for such a violation of human rights.
America is full of such violations.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2014, 06:37 PM
 
5,365 posts, read 6,339,276 times
Reputation: 3360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
America is full of such violations.
And thankfully we are a progressive society that is making great strides in striking those violations down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2014, 06:38 PM
 
45,227 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24985
Quote:
Originally Posted by CravingMountains View Post
And thankfully we are a progressive society that is making great strides in striking those violations down.
Progressives are behind many of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2014, 06:41 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,364,082 times
Reputation: 7990
If we can ban big gulp sodas, why can't we ban unprotected anal sex? The logic is the same in both cases--deleterious health consequences, which must be paid for by the taxpayer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-21-2014, 06:55 PM
 
45,227 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24985
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
If we can ban big gulp sodas, why can't we ban unprotected anal sex? The logic is the same in both cases--deleterious health consequences, which must be paid for by the taxpayer.
More progressive hypocrisy, they want to screw and marry who they want and tell you what to eat and drink at the same time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top