*Democrat* NJ Mayoral candidate caught dropping N-Bombmb (KKK, dollars, financial)

[West Coast Republican]

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

Racism isn't just a Republican or Democrat problem, it is an American problem and happens on both sides of the political spectrum.

This is something that we actually agree on for once, good post!

[rbohm]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

You have never been to an NAACP Meeting then.

Its grounded with in the church, and indeed leans more to conservative ideology than Liberal. It simply has more Democratic members than Republicans.

that was true many years ago, but todays NAACP is liberal and nearly fully supports the democrat party.

Originally Posted by urbanlife78

Well if the statement isn't racist, then why would people react just because the person is a Republican?

because it is a way to try and destroy the republican party. you know this, so why are you being obstinate about this?

[itshim]

Originally Posted by chucksnee

Then you should tell all your leftist friends....if this would have been a repub, it would be 10 pages of lookie lookie...see repubs are racist....within a matter of a few minutes...

Don't believe it, just search duck dynasty in this forum....

The hypocrisy is breath taking at times. Now when it's a clear cut Democratic candidate making the comment...someone who is clearly involved in politics, it's a "person not the party" issue.

How is this NOT a political issue, considering that this Democratic candidate is running for a political position to represent her political party?

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by itshim

You've been corrected again. His *last* registration was in 1998, we don't know if he is registered anywhere else and what his voting pattern is. We do have a history of which party he has donated to though, but according to you that was 20 years ago.

And he has donated to the NAACP and is set to receive his *2nd* lifetime achievement award.

In previous threads, Sterling's affiliation were downplayed when it was alleged that he may have been a Democrat.

1. In California, the only time you have to register to vote is the first time.

2. There is no re registration process unless you change addresses.

3. 1998 is the last time he changed party affiliation, not the last time he registered as you keep stating.

please stop digging the hole you are currently in.

And we talked about this already. Previous threads were about the Controversy were as this one is specifically about party affiliation

[saltine]

Originally Posted by itshim

The hypocrisy is breath taking at times. Now when it's a clear cut Democratic candidate making the comment...someone who is clearly involved in politics, it's a "person not the party" issue.

How is this NOT a political issue, considering that this Democratic candidate is running for a political position to represent her political party?

answered your own question

[shadowne]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

1. In California, the only time you have to register to vote is the first time.

2. There is no re registration process unless you change addresses.

3. 1998 is the last time he changed party affiliation, not the last time he registered as you keep stating.

please stop digging the hole you are currently in.

You are in the wrong thread. This one is about the NJ Mayoral candidate who stepped in it.

[itshim]

Originally Posted by dsjj251

You didnt correct me the first time.

Last registration doesnt make his current position past tense. He didnt change his status to independent.

Neither does his past donations and political support...

You've been corrected twice already. Now you're in denial.

The NAACP is a "liberal" institution. They are no longer conservative, remember they "switched" sides back in the 60s?

[saltine]

Originally Posted by shadowne

You are in the wrong thread. This one is about the NJ Mayoral candidate who stepped in it.

thats ok... we have a mod that will delete all posts not related to the thread... unless?

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by rbohm

that was true many years ago, but todays NAACP is liberal and nearly fully supports the democrat party.

Supporting the Democratic Party does not make you Liberal. Again, the Democratic Party has more than one ideology.

And again, I have actually attended NAACP meeting, Liberal is not the word i would describe it with. Every person in that room was ideologically to the right of myself.

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by itshim

Neither does his past donations and political support...

You've been corrected twice already. Now you're in denial.

The NAACP is a "liberal" institution. They are no longer conservative, remember they "switched" sides back in the 60s?

I am a Democrat, i have voted for Republicans, does that make me a Republican ?? according to your argument, yes.

Again, Conservative and Liberal are not the only 2 ideologies out there, so there is more than one "side"

and as i stated earlier, it seems im the only one here who has actually attended an NAACP meeting.