Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by yakijy
Is Because Bill Is A True World Class Leader, And Bush Is A Trailor Trash Bully?????
A little bit of commentary about Alan Greenspan's book by John Farmer:
"Greenspan, Federal Reserve Board chairman for 18 years until he quit in 2006, delivers a devastating critique of Bush in a new memoir, painting the president as an uninformed and incurious leader and an economic dunce whose tolerance for runaway spending squandered a huge budget surplus and saddled the country with a vast annual deficit. (Now he tells us.)
Theres a hero in Greenspans book, but alas for the GOP, its former President Bill Clinton, the epitome of evil in Republican lore.
Contrasting him starkly and favorably with Bush, Greenspan depicts Clinton as a man of limitless curiosity about everything and a veritable sponge, soaking up information like a star student, someone Greenspan could identify with.
"Here was a fellow information hound," Greenspan writes. "We both read books and were curious and thoughtful about the world . . . I never ceased to be surprised by his fascination with economic detail." Clinton and Richard Nixon were the smartest presidents he served, Greenspan says. "
I think world leaders enjoy speaking with those who have some knowledge about their respective countries and a desire to learn more.
The rest of the world didn't have to live with Clinton for eight years. Let's face it -- he's a great charmer and schmoozer. Always knows exactly what to say. That could fool lots of people who didn't get the up-close-and-personal view that we Americans did.
With Bush, it's a lot easier to see that he's a dope. Plus, his reckless actions actually affect the rest of the world.
This isn't a Bush/Clinton thing. It is a Republican/Democrat issue. Did the world really love Nixon or Reagan? And what about Carter? He couldn't lead the country out of a peanut bag yet the world loved him.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
I don't think Bush much helped his reputation in the world when shortly after 9/11 he referred to the coming war on terror as a Crusade, really no different than an Arabic leader asking for a holocaust.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,329 posts, read 54,389,283 times
Reputation: 40736
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
Ironic that 38 countries are still in Iraq with us, but not one has ever joined one of Clintons attacks..
Searching for data on the coalition I find:As of August 23, 2006, there were 21 non-U.S. military forces contributing armed forces to the Coalition in Iraq. These 21 countries were: Albania, Armenia, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Moldova, Mongolia, Poland, Romania, South Korea, and the United Kingdom.
And the missing 17 are???
And what have we promised in return for some countries participation?
After all, the most obnoxious man in the world can stroll with a beautiful woman on each arm for the right amount of $$$$$$$$$, doesn't mean they're his friends.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.