Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-21-2014, 10:08 AM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 21 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,549 posts, read 16,536,658 times
Reputation: 6032

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by armory View Post
White liberals are the reason anything is offensive to anyone. While others have to work for a living and worry about life, white liberal progressives dream up stuff that has never bothered anyone in the past and push it in their faces while holding press conferences about how offensive their dreamed up topic is. It's along the lines of legal commercials and lawyers fishing for frivolous law suits.

So now - since Obama has taken office - Redskins is offensive for the first time since I have lived in the DC area. I have never seen fans doing Warrior chants and imitating tomahawk chopping as they do in Atlanta during Braves games.


I guess the Indians, Seminoles, Braves and other teams are next on the chopping block.
What do we call redskin potatoes/peanuts now?

Good thing I am a fan of the Orioles and Cowboys. No one seems interested in the outrage expressed by birds or white men in 10 gallon hats on horses.
Native American mascot controversy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

President Obama wasnt even born when this started.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-21-2014, 10:22 AM
 
5,756 posts, read 3,997,165 times
Reputation: 2308
Quote:
Originally Posted by armory View Post

Good thing I am a fan of the Orioles and Cowboys. No one seems interested in the outrage expressed by birds or white men in 10 gallon hats on horses.
The Cowboys are changing their name too ...The Bareback Mountain Boys riding unicorns...The Washington Scandals anyone?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 10:54 AM
 
Location: Florida
33,571 posts, read 18,154,780 times
Reputation: 15545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbdowndemocrats View Post
The Cowboys are changing their name too ...The Bareback Mountain Boys riding unicorns...The Washington Scandals anyone?
Now that is offensive.. cowboy.. it ishould be cattlemen...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 11:01 AM
 
Location: NW Nevada
18,158 posts, read 15,623,058 times
Reputation: 17149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Now that is offensive.. cowboy.. it ishould be cattlemen...
Wahahahaha! Good point. The left does LOVE to use the word "cowboy" in a very disrespectful context. Ban it!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Lebanon, OH
7,079 posts, read 8,941,070 times
Reputation: 14739
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dumbdowndemocrats View Post
If its Brown flush it down!
Go BENGALS!
They should change the name to Cleveland Steamers.

Cleveland Steamers gets your chest cleaner!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Goodnight View Post
Redskins is offensive, period.
Washington is offensive. Period.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 04:45 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
Irish is a nationality, not a derogatory term.
Fighting Irish implies that Irish people are violent, therefore it is offensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 04:49 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by plannine;35327668

The only reason to identify a [B
group of people[/b] by skin color is to be offensive. That is not "God's" doing.
Not true at all. The color of ones skin is descriptive. I'm surprised you use skin color to be offensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 07:53 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by TreeBeard View Post
I think it all is a matter of context. Hypothetically, if an African sports club was named the "white skins" and used an image of let's say George Washington as their mascot, there are more than a few people who find that offensive.
It would not bother me at all. Only thin skinned people who want to tell others how to live would be offended.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-21-2014, 07:57 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
And just the opposite can be claimed.

Your argument is that the word is offensive simply because you are offended by it, that is flawed logic at its worst!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top