Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Honestly the above is just one more reason why there should be a rule that those who are not married and those who have no reasonable expectation of marriage of any kind ever in their life ... , should be disallowed from having a say -- and especially, from having a VOTE --in this debate.
You are just another liberal who wants to disenfranchise people.
Voter suppression - the campaign tactic of the Democrats since they have no hope of winning the 2014 elections.
So, the clear will of the people of California was not overruled by an openly gay man in a black robe?
The state of California was forced to endorse gay marriages and Harrier as a Californian is part of the state of California.
Strike one.
If Harrier wanted to become a baker in Colorado, but didn't accept homosexual marriages as being valid, then he could choose to not bake a cake for such an event?
A baker in Colorado was forced to accept homosexual marriage.
Strike two.
Two gay people didn't stand on top of a float during the Rose Parade and conduct a "wedding" ceremony in front of families with children who came to see the bands, horses, and floats, not a freakish display of perversion?
Harrier refused to watch that parade - which is the only way he avoided having that publicity stunt shoved down his throat.
Strike three.
You are out(not coming).
ROTFLMAO!!
I'm pretty sure people who go to Pride parades know exactly what they're going to see.
What the gay army doesn't seem to understand is that they are the aggressors.
It is they who want to promote their lifestyle, force acceptance of homosexuality on the rest of us, and redefine societal norms and institutions.
It is their responsibility to make an argument as to why their lifestyle should be endorsed by the people who they are forcing it upon.
No one cares what gay people do in the privacy of their homes, and if they kept their sexual lives private then there wouldn't be any backlash against them.
It was their choice to be militant, be bullies, and make their lifestyle center stage.
Now they are claiming victimhood.
What a joke.
When you poke someone in the eye, don't expect them to be docile and not react.
What straight people like you don't understand is that YOU are the aggressors and always were, by passing legislation denying rights to others that you yourself enjoy. I know it sucks to no longer be special and protected from the scary gays, but I'm afraid you'll just have to deal.
So you're against Pride Parades and Rose Parades? Anything else? How about the Santa Claus Parade?
I want to see two of Santa's elves marry each other.
But no judge can order heterosexuals to really accept it.
and it never will be.
More and more heterosexuals are accepting SSM. The important thing, is that SSM is legal, and these people receive all the benefits they have worked hard for, and are entitled to.
And why do people like you have to continually call those with different opinions "haters", "bigots" and "prejudiced".
He didn't say he hated gays. He didn't say he wanted to harm them. He clearly said they can do anything they want.
Perhaps you just can't stand the fact that there are millions upon millions of people who do not agree that being gay is okay.
So go be gay...but it will never be considered normal by the majority.
You are being paid lip service (no pun intended) by the millennial sheeple.
Do you tell your gay friends that it isn't okay to be gay and that they are abnormal people?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.