Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:09 PM
 
2,962 posts, read 5,003,528 times
Reputation: 1887

Advertisements

The power companies don't want to built nuclear plants either. They aren't as economically viable as you may think.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:14 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,954,867 times
Reputation: 2938
Nuclear energy can't be used to power the transportation system, so the premise of the thread title that it could replace fossil fuels is not valid. No matter of how much nuclear energy you have, you still need vast amounts of fossil fuels to run all the cars, airplanes, trains, semi trucks, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:22 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,360 posts, read 6,532,723 times
Reputation: 5187
Quote:
Originally Posted by cisco kid View Post
Nuclear energy can't be used to power the transportation system, so the premise of the thread title that it could replace fossil fuels is not valid. No matter of how much nuclear energy you have, you still need vast amounts of fossil fuels to run all the cars, airplanes, trains, semi trucks, etc.
All but the airplanes can be electrically powered, either directly (trains) or with battery storage. That doesn't even include other fuel forms that are developing such as true bio-fuels, and hydrogen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:30 PM
 
59,111 posts, read 27,349,464 times
Reputation: 14290
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
And does the OP also blame nuclear power plant disasters on liberals too?
And how many nuclear disasters have we had in the U.S?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,198,674 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Yes, 2002.
Link?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,198,674 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quick Enough View Post
And how many nuclear disasters have we had in the U.S?
Already linked and commented on this, if you want you can find that information on Wikipedia.

Thankfully it has been a long time since our last big disaster. I would never want to see any place have to deal with what Japan had to deal with, would you?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 03:58 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,954,867 times
Reputation: 2938
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
All but the airplanes can be electrically powered, either directly (trains) or with battery storage. That doesn't even include other fuel forms that are developing such as true bio-fuels, and hydrogen.
Nuclear-generated electricity can be used to power small electric passenger vehicles, but does not scale well with larger vehicles such as 18 wheel semis or even passenger SUVs and minivans that people in North America are so fond of driving. We are also a nation of airplane travelers and our economy is heavily dependent on imported goods that is transported by sea with massive diesel-powered container shipping. There's no such thing as electric-powered shipping. Biofuels and hydrogen are a joke because they require as much energy to produce as you get out of them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 04:14 PM
 
Location: Decatur, GA
7,360 posts, read 6,532,723 times
Reputation: 5187
Quote:
Originally Posted by cisco kid View Post
Nuclear-generated electricity can be used to power small electric passenger vehicles, but does not scale well with larger vehicles such as 18 wheel semis or even passenger SUVs and minivans that people in North America are so fond of driving. We are also a nation of airplane travelers and our economy is heavily dependent on imported goods that is transported by sea with massive diesel-powered container shipping. There's no such thing as electric-powered shipping. Biofuels and hydrogen are a joke because they require as much energy to produce as you get out of them.
You're only looking the situation as it exists now. The technologies are rapidly improving. But fossil fuel power plants are still huge contributors of pollution while nuclear plants are non-polluting. If anything, because less transportation of materials is needed, their "overhead" pollution due to transportation is significantly less than fossil-fuel plants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 04:35 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,981 posts, read 22,172,656 times
Reputation: 13811
Quote:
Originally Posted by AeroGuyDC View Post
Another failed argument. This is precisely why we don't have an expansive nuclear power infrastructure. Because of these made up liberal boogeyman arguments.
The movie China Syndrome, scared the nation, and the libs made it all but impossible to build a nuclear power plant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-30-2014, 04:52 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,954,867 times
Reputation: 2938
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattCW View Post
You're only looking the situation as it exists now. The technologies are rapidly improving. But fossil fuel power plants are still huge contributors of pollution while nuclear plants are non-polluting. If anything, because less transportation of materials is needed, their "overhead" pollution due to transportation is significantly less than fossil-fuel plants.
This is mere speculation. There's no guarantee hydrogen technology will ever reach the point where it can be mass-produced on a wide consumer industrial scale at an affordable price, or that biofuels will ever become a net energy positive source of energy. We're not even close and I think its highly doubtful it will get to that point, and shows that even technology has its limits.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top