Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
This "investigative committee" (actually a partisan political publicity stunt) will start showing up in news reports as the election approaches. And they'll have absolutely nothing but the exact same empty ugly allegations w/o a shred of evidence. But they'll certainly smear the election season with their mud slinging.
The Benghazi issue is not over until those who lied admit they lied and suffer the consequences for breach of the public trust ( holding an office and being dishonest).
And, for those who are guilty of failing to defend American's lives are held accountably, politically, if not legally. I'm all for Hillary and Obama facing charges for conspiracy to allow murder.
If that in fact happened, would it not set a legal precedent to bring Bush and Cheney in to be prosecuted for breach of the public trust and for conspiracy to allow murder in Iraq? If not--why? There were were certainly more deaths and higher stakes due to the Iraq lies.
If that in fact happened, would it not set a legal precedent to bring Bush and Cheney in to be prosecuted for breach of the public trust and for conspiracy to allow murder in Iraq? If not--why? There were were certainly more deaths and higher stakes due to the Iraq lies.
What Iraq "lies?"
Resuming military action was approved by Congress. It wasn't just Bush and Cheney.
Quote:
Originally Posted by chad3 4 Americans were killed in the Benghazi attacks, and maybe a few lies were told (and republicans attack Obama for this like a pack of wolves.)
As a Tea Partier do you think this is worst than Watergate...by now according to the Tea Party types Obama has already had 16 Watergates. Which do you think is the worst one or are all 16 impeachable offenses?
Inquiring minds want to know what Trey Gowdy and the Tea Party have in mind for the Benghazi hearings?
As a Tea Partier dont you think the Benghazi issue is dead. Or as a Tea Partier do you think this dog runs until November?
Inquiring minds want to know what Trey Gowdy and the Tea Party have in mind for the Benghazi hearings?
As a Tea Partier dont you think the Benghazi issue is dead. Or as a Tea Partier do you think this dog runs until November?
I don't know. Since EVERY post you submit, you have something to say, more like whine, about the Tea Party, YOU should know since you claim to know so much about them.
Every dollar they spend on this nonsense should be posted on the front page of every newspaper every day.
Really--you would think the real fiscal conservatives would stand up and object to the rest of their party wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on witch hunts and lawsuits. But.....silence.
Right! And EVERY hearing the dems have ever had when they had control of Congress, at one time 40 straight years, was as pure as the virgin snow.
If you can't take it, don't dish it out.
By the way how much did the Valerie Plame debacle cost?
There is ALWAYS money for a good GOP political witch hunt. Ken Starr squandered more than $70 million to catch Clinton lying about an extramarital affair. I'm sure all our good fiscal conservative friends here will say it was money well spent.
Another dem with little knowledge of the subject yet, makes claims as if they do.
EVERY THING Starr did was APPROVED by his boss, Janet Reno, the DEM A.G.
So, WHO is responsible for the spending?
I know, according to you, a little detail.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.