Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: True or Not?
True and she should be hung 16 30.19%
Not true at all 10 18.87%
I don't really know 2 3.77%
I really don't care. 26 49.06%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-08-2014, 08:54 PM
 
Location: Upstate NY 🇺🇸
36,753 posts, read 14,875,284 times
Reputation: 35590

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrClose View Post
This will be my last response to this thread.

It would seem that None of you know anything other than what you have been taught in your government run schools.

You refuse to even consider information that is given from first hand accounts!

I'd venture to say that not many of you had history teachers that ever even held an M-16 let alone fought for anything .. other than a last piece of pie!

The mis-information and outright lies are insurmountable and frankly, as has been pointed out .. you folks who probably weren't even living at the time .. just don't give a d@mn.

Saigon was the center for most if not all of the news agencies that were covering the war in South Vietnam.

The Tet offensive was the first time, during the war, that actual street fighting took place in the major cities.

Rear support personnel and MP’s did the initial fighting by American troops until support from infantry and armor could arrive.

The news media were able to capture this street fighting on tape in addition to the attack on the American Embassy.

This new offensive was immediately brought into the homes of American families through reporting by television and the press.

The sensationalism of this reporting brought forth a misrepresentation of the actual facts that took place during Tet.
(Cronkite/ Fonda)

The reports led the American people to think that we were losing the war in Vietnam and that the Tet Offensive was a major victory for North Vietnam.
(Cronkite)


The VC suffered such high casualties that they were no longer considered a fighting force and their ranks would have to be replaced by North Vietnamese regulars.

The military defeat of North Vietnam after the Tet Offensive became a political victory for North Vietnam because of anti-war demonstrations and the sensationalism (Cronkite) of the news media.

The North Vietnamese interpreted the U.S. reaction to these events as the weakening of America's resolve to win the war.

The North Vietnamese believed that victory could be theirs, if they stayed their course.

The sensationalism by the American news media (Cronkite) and the anti-war protests (Fonda) following Tet gave hope to Communist North Vietnam, strengthening their belief that their will to succeed was greater than ours.

Instead of seeking a successful resolution at the Paris Peace Conference following the disastrous defeat of the Tet Offensive, they employed delay tactics as another tool to inflame U.S. politics.

This delaying tactic spurned further anti-war demonstrations. Those who sensationalized their reporting of the war (Most especially Walter Cronkite) and those who supported anti-war demonstrations (Fonda) are guilty of giving our enemy hope.

Because of their actions, they must share partial responsibility for those 20,000 + American deaths that occurred after tet until our full exit from nam.

We won the war on the battlefield but lost it back home on the college campuses and in the city streets.
(Communists and leftists, which of course .. have the same goals)

Right on all counts.

Pictures do, indeed, say a thousand words and Fonda will never live down her traitorous past. Her own father, one of Hollywood's biggest liberals, didn't speak to her for decades because of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-08-2014, 08:57 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,287,056 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrClose View Post
This will be my last response to this thread.

It would seem that None of you know anything other than what you have been taught in your government run schools.

You refuse to even consider information that is given from first hand accounts!

I'd venture to say that not many of you had history teachers that ever even held an M-16 let alone fought for anything .. other than a last piece of pie!

The mis-information and outright lies are insurmountable and frankly, as has been pointed out .. you folks who probably weren't even living at the time .. just don't give a d@mn.

Saigon was the center for most if not all of the news agencies that were covering the war in South Vietnam.

The Tet offensive was the first time, during the war, that actual street fighting took place in the major cities.

Rear support personnel and MP’s did the initial fighting by American troops until support from infantry and armor could arrive.

The news media were able to capture this street fighting on tape in addition to the attack on the American Embassy.

This new offensive was immediately brought into the homes of American families through reporting by television and the press.

The sensationalism of this reporting brought forth a misrepresentation of the actual facts that took place during Tet.
(Cronkite/ Fonda)

The reports led the American people to think that we were losing the war in Vietnam and that the Tet Offensive was a major victory for North Vietnam.
(Cronkite)


The VC suffered such high casualties that they were no longer considered a fighting force and their ranks would have to be replaced by North Vietnamese regulars.

The military defeat of North Vietnam after the Tet Offensive became a political victory for North Vietnam because of anti-war demonstrations and the sensationalism (Cronkite) of the news media.

The North Vietnamese interpreted the U.S. reaction to these events as the weakening of America's resolve to win the war.

The North Vietnamese believed that victory could be theirs, if they stayed their course.

The sensationalism by the American news media (Cronkite) and the anti-war protests (Fonda) following Tet gave hope to Communist North Vietnam, strengthening their belief that their will to succeed was greater than ours.

Instead of seeking a successful resolution at the Paris Peace Conference following the disastrous defeat of the Tet Offensive, they employed delay tactics as another tool to inflame U.S. politics.

This delaying tactic spurned further anti-war demonstrations. Those who sensationalized their reporting of the war (Most especially Walter Cronkite) and those who supported anti-war demonstrations (Fonda) are guilty of giving our enemy hope.

Because of their actions, they must share partial responsibility for those 20,000 + American deaths that occurred after tet until our full exit from nam.

We won the war on the battlefield but lost it back home on the college campuses and in the city streets.
(Communists and leftists, which of course .. have the same goals)
Nixon and Kissinger sabotaged the Paris Peace Conference by telling the South Vietnamese (behind Johnson's back) that if they held out, they'd get a better deal with Nixon.

So THEY are responsible for those 20k deaths...not Cronkite, Fonda or war protesters.

But you knew that already.

But the saddest thing is that for some strange reason, you believe that interfering in an Asian civil war was a noble cause.

And really, i'm not surprised.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:02 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,287,056 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
Right on all counts.

Pictures do, indeed, say a thousand words and Fonda will never live down her traitorous past. Her own father, one of Hollywood's biggest liberals, didn't speak to her for decades because of it.
Henry Fonda ALWAYS had a strained relationship with his children until the day he died. His relationship with Peter was just as tense.

So that's not the source of why her father didn't speak to her. To my knowledge, Henry Fonda never spoke about the incident.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:05 PM
 
2,672 posts, read 2,723,499 times
Reputation: 1041
Quote:
Originally Posted by Delahanty View Post
Right on all counts.

Pictures do, indeed, say a thousand words and Fonda will never live down her traitorous past. Her own father, one of Hollywood's biggest liberals, didn't speak to her for decades because of it.
So On Golden Pond never happened in 1981. You just passed on more internet babble without any documentation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:05 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,504,201 times
Reputation: 4186
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
She actively tried to undermine the US when we were at war and had soldiers dying in combat. In WWII they would have dug a hole for someone like her.
We weren't legally at war, and she did not violate any known law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:10 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,504,201 times
Reputation: 4186
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
Really? So you're incapable of comprehending the difference between entering into a war and aiding the enemy after that war is underway? You seriously don't see the difference?
Yes, there's a difference. Starting the war was a lot worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:22 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,474,735 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
What nation were you at war with?
Don't play stupid semantic games. Even though we didn't declare war, everyone called it the Vietnam War.
Quote:
And why were you at war with them? Did they come here and destroy your hometown and kill your neighbors?
America was operating under the Domino Theory - a theory devised by Democrats, by the way, even though Democrats now like to say they were against going to war in Vietnam - that the Soviets were attempting to spread their ideology by toppling one third world nation at a time until they eventually had enough of the world under their influence that they could strangle the West.
Quote:
The traitors are the people that supported that dumb ass war to begin with. They're the ones that should be apologizing for supporting a senseless war that killed nearly 60k of our young men.
No, they aren't. Being a traitor means something. You should get a dictionary and look the word up. But that's part of normal liberal intellectual dishonesty - to malign people who disagree with them as evil rather than simply differing in opinion on what the best way is to achieve the common good. Maybe you want to call JFK a traitor, but I hardly think anybody else is going to agree with you.
Quote:
Jane Fonda has nothing to apologize for.
Maybe in your worldview she doesn't. But here in the sane world, when American people call American soldiers being tortured and starved liars, that's something to apologize for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-08-2014, 09:23 PM
 
Location: Michigan
12,711 posts, read 13,504,201 times
Reputation: 4186
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrClose View Post
We won the war on the battlefield but lost it back home on the college campuses and in the city streets.
Col. Harry Summers: You know, you never beat us on the battlefield.
Col. Bui Tin: That is true, but it is also irrelevant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2014, 12:01 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,228 posts, read 22,455,967 times
Reputation: 23867
How many of you were even alive back then?
All this is ancient and has been beaten to death more times than I can count.

Fonda is bumping 80 now. Leave her alone. She admitted she was ignorant and foolish years ago, and it's way past time to be re-fighting Viet Nam one more time.

We have enough current problems on our plate to be re-chewing old cabbage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-09-2014, 12:04 AM
 
Location: Old Mother Idaho
29,228 posts, read 22,455,967 times
Reputation: 23867
Quote:
Originally Posted by borregokid View Post
So On Golden Pond never happened in 1981. You just passed on more internet babble without any documentation.
Money doesn't count? They both got a very fat deal for tolerating each other on camera.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top