Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So anything that happened during Oblama's administration is ultimately George Bush's fault. Tell us, at what point do you stop blaming Bush? Year 2100?
I'm merely pointing out that the reason a Democrat won, is because the American People were so sick of Bush (Iraq War) who happened to be a Republican. McCain never had a chance - didn't really matter that he picked Palin, even though that did kind of help A LOT. The Youth would have
never voted republican in that election and that is what carried Obama to WIN.
IMO, I think Obama owns wars now, add in Libya and mostly every ****ty thing that happens is his administrations fault and his lack of, I hate to say leadership - because I don't like where he's headed, so I'll just say, lack of priorities. But then, I'd be saying the same thing about a Republican President too.
It's also his failure to work with other party strategy. Ram it down their throats with no compromise.
The man would be a true failure in any business situation where one had to work with others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812
I actually think his strategy, if you can call it that, is to create chaos by turning everyone against each other, to make it impossible for any solutions to be arrived at, so that things do become a crisis. Then he jumps up, points the finger of blame at everyone else and demands unilateral action be taken by him to address the crisis...
This.
Unfortunately, it's not just him, as he has a lot of collaborators. In addition to a cult-like following of people who think he can do no wrong and everything is someone else's fault (e.g. Bush or Repubs).
So anything that happened during Oblama's administration is ultimately George Bush's fault. Tell us, at what point do you stop blaming Bush? Year 2100?
Exactly. They'll never get it. How idiotic does one have to be to pull the lever for Barack Obama not once, but twice?
The ultimate demonstration of sheep-like ignorance was the election of 2012.
Obstructionism? You don't think the abject failure of Obama's policies have anything to do with his 38% disapproval, of Obama’s handling of international affairs, and only 31% approve of his handling of immigration, are all due to Republican obstructionism?
How about the man has no vision, no understanding, no strategy or sense of how to deal with domestic or international affairs. He dithers, he ignores the issues, he refuses to become engaged at any level, and then when things turn to crap, and become a five-alarm fire of a crisis, then he lurches forward with clumsy, reckless abandon and demands to be given dictatorial powers to act unilaterally.
That's also when Obama pretends he just flew in from planet Mars, shakes his head in wonderment at the sorry state of affairs we've created. Demands to know who the hell the incompetent boobs are, who been in charge down here on earth. Then he lectures us all on what he would have done, if only he had been in charge.
This post is perfection!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
