How do liberals decide what to be angry at? (wages, conspiracy, boycott)

[VTHokieFan]

For example

How do liberals decide to be angry at:

• The Washington Redskins team name
• White males
• gender income gap myth

But not:

• Hope Solo's domestic abuse charges
• Nike's use of slave wages in their products (I don't see a mass Nike boycott)
• gender inequality in divorce court hearings
• use of the "Fighting Irish" nickname by Notre Dame's athletic teams

We all know why: liberals aren't really angry, they don't care at all. Liberals do not care about Native Americans. Liberals hate white males because they do not vote for them (Before you say I'm out of line, name one way you've helped white males). And liberals CERTAINLY do not care about the income gap as we've seen countless Demorat campaigns where women are paid less than men. It is all a lie manufactured to put people into groups and then go after those groups to get votes. Divide and Conquer.

[Casper in Dallas]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

For example

How do liberals decide to be angry at:

• The Washington Redskins team name
• White males
• gender income gap myth

But not:

• Hope Solo's domestic abuse charges
• Nike's use of slave wages in their products (I don't see a mass Nike boycott)
• gender inequality in divorce court hearings
• use of the "Fighting Irish" nickname by Notre Dame's athletic teams

We all know why: liberals aren't really angry, they don't care at all. Liberals do not care about Native Americans. Liberals hate white males because they do not vote for them (Before you say I'm out of line, name one way you've helped white males). And liberals CERTAINLY do not care about the income gap as we've seen countless Demorat campaigns where women are paid less than men. It is all a lie manufactured to put people into groups and then go after those groups to get votes. Divide and Conquer.

Where you looking for replies and discussion or just a place to Vent as Usual?

[VTHokieFan]

Originally Posted by Casper in Dallas

Where you looking for replies and discussion or just a place to Vent as Usual?

Discussion. How do you decide what to be angry at? Maybe if you are too sensitive, I can pose it in a really easy way.

Why are you outraged over the use of the Washington Redskins, and not the Notre Dame fighting Irish?

[EmeraldCityWanderer]

I honestly think this is a joke. No one makes claims about "all liberals" as some sort of vast hive mind which follow orders from above in a vast sociopath conspiracy to get votes to do...well, something. Even un-medicated schizophrenics like Alex Jones would draw the line at something this obviously silly.

Thanks for the laugh!

[Casper in Dallas]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

Discussion. How do you decide what to be angry at? Maybe if you are too sensitive, I can pose it in a really easy way.

Why are you outraged over the use of the Washington Redskins, and not the Notre Dame fighting Irish?

I am not outraged by either, you just assume I am, as your long final comment in the op where you answer your own question clearly displayed.
By the way, I was not actually asking you a question, it was more of a comment

[dsjj251]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

For example

How do liberals decide to be angry at:

• The Washington Redskins team name
• White males
• gender income gap myth

But not:

• Hope Solo's domestic abuse charges
• Nike's use of slave wages in their products (I don't see a mass Nike boycott)
• gender inequality in divorce court hearings
• use of the "Fighting Irish" nickname by Notre Dame's athletic teams

We all know why: liberals aren't really angry, they don't care at all. Liberals do not care about Native Americans. Liberals hate white males because they do not vote for them (Before you say I'm out of line, name one way you've helped white males). And liberals CERTAINLY do not care about the income gap as we've seen countless Demorat campaigns where women are paid less than men. It is all a lie manufactured to put people into groups and then go after those groups to get votes. Divide and Conquer.

people arent mad at white males. And there is a gender income gap.

People arent mad at Hope solo(regardless of ideology), because there is Gender bias, however, she is still going to go to jail for it( they charged her and arrested her). There is also the fact that She only plays on national TV once every 4 years, and the media isnt covering her story at all, so no one really knows about it outside the people who watch ESPN at 11 AM on a Monday.

People boycott Nike all the time, i think that one is just a lack of knowledge on your part.

As for divorce courts, i dont think anyone has really researched that one enough to make the argument you are making or make one in favor of the other corner.

Notre Dame is named after a military company, not Irish people and their ability to fight.

[rhawkins74]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

For example

How do liberals decide to be angry at:

• The Washington Redskins team name
• White males
• gender income gap myth

But not:

• Hope Solo's domestic abuse charges
• Nike's use of slave wages in their products (I don't see a mass Nike boycott)
• gender inequality in divorce court hearings
• use of the "Fighting Irish" nickname by Notre Dame's athletic teams

We all know why: liberals aren't really angry, they don't care at all. Liberals do not care about Native Americans. Liberals hate white males because they do not vote for them (Before you say I'm out of line, name one way you've helped white males). And liberals CERTAINLY do not care about the income gap as we've seen countless Demorat campaigns where women are paid less than men. It is all a lie manufactured to put people into groups and then go after those groups to get votes. Divide and Conquer.

The liberals only care about white males. They do not care about minorities or women.

[nurider2002]

don't think I've been angry since W left office.

[T-310]

Liberals need a problem to solve.

They feel helpless unless there is some social issue they can sink their teeth into and then wail and screech about how unfair their made-up issue is.

Take income inequality and MW. People earn money according to their skills and how they market themselves in the workplace. Some paid more, some less. Yet liberals will tell you that it is a problem that a hamburger flipper breeding at the rate of a child a year doesn't make as much as a Wall St CEO.

That's what I see liberals do daily.

[desertdetroiter]

Originally Posted by VTHokieFan

For example

How do liberals decide to be angry at:

• The Washington Redskins team name
• White males
• gender income gap myth

But not:

• Hope Solo's domestic abuse charges
• Nike's use of slave wages in their products (I don't see a mass Nike boycott)
• gender inequality in divorce court hearings
• use of the "Fighting Irish" nickname by Notre Dame's athletic teams

We all know why: liberals aren't really angry, they don't care at all. Liberals do not care about Native Americans. Liberals hate white males because they do not vote for them (Before you say I'm out of line, name one way you've helped white males). And liberals CERTAINLY do not care about the income gap as we've seen countless Demorat campaigns where women are paid less than men. It is all a lie manufactured to put people into groups and then go after those groups to get votes. Divide and Conquer.

What's your REAL heartburn with Hope Solo...because you're obviously obsessed by that chick for some reason.

And after all of this conservative small government nonsense, NOW you want the government to help you because you're a white man...isn't that special?

The government works OVERTIME doing things for white males. The problem is that you're not the type of white man they seek to help. You're a POOR white man. Our government helps rich white men only.

Sorry...you're out of the loop.

The government isn't helping my black ass either, so join the club and get over yourself.