Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As I explained in an NRO article in May, the district court judge, Lynn Adelman, a Clinton appointee and former Democratic state senator, had issued an injunction claiming the Wisconsin ID law violated the Voting Rights Act as well as the Fourteenth Amendment. Adelman made the startling claim in his opinion that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in 2008 upholding Indiana’s voter-ID law as constitutional was “not binding precedent,” so Adelman could essentially ignore it.
However, that was too much for the Seventh Circuit. It pointed out, in what most lawyers would consider a rebuke, that Adelman had held Wisconsin’s law invalid “even though it is materially identical to Indiana’s photo ID statute, which the Supreme Court held valid in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, 553 U.S. 181 (2008).”
The Criminal enterprise known as the Obama Administration won't care. Their minions will continue to be hard at work "Fundamentally Transforming" America as we knew it.
Yes! Dems have been using frivolous and specious legal tactics to try to steal the Wisconsin Gubernatorial election. Couldn't win the recall legally. Won't win this one as their tawdry tactics are exposed.
On Friday the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals responded to a media request and released documents that had been sealed as part of a John Doe probe into Mr. Walker's fund-raising. The court's clerk also bungled and released, for a brief period, some documents that weren't supposed to be unsealed, including donor names and references to bank records. Unless you're a political Bambi, the only news in the documents is further evidence that the prosecutors are operating on an unconstitutional interpretation of campaign-finance law.
A supermajority of Americans support (and have consistently supported) voter ID laws, and that includes people of different races, religions, and color. To argue for no voter ID laws (I grant that there can be disagreements about the exact type of law) is completely antithetical to any argument about preserving a democracy in this country.
A supermajority of Americans support (and have consistently supported) voter ID laws, and that includes people of different races, religions, and color. To argue for no voter ID laws (I grant that there can be disagreements about the exact type of law) is completely antithetical to any argument about preserving a democracy in this country.
Poof that a super-majority support it?
Proof that because a majority support something it is right?
..................
Proof that because a majority support something it is right?
that's what a democracy is
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
