Do Democrats believe they are incapable of winning a fair election?

[Swampmonster]

Originally Posted by chad3

What is it called when you edit out another posters sources, and then leave one sentence of their original post, and then say that sentence is false?

(When their sources proved that sentence was true.)

What would you call that?

You call that "against the TOS" here and it has gotten people banned in the past...lets hope that is the case this time as well

[pnwmdk]

Originally Posted by chad3

What is it called when you edit out another posters sources, and then leave one sentence of their original post, and then say that sentence is false?

(When their sources proved that sentence was true.)

What would you call that?

I'm sorry, lying about proof doesn't add any credibility.

No PROOF was offered.

[pnwmdk]

Originally Posted by muleskinner

You call that "against the TOS" here and it has gotten people banned in the past...lets hope that is the case this time as well

Yes, it's the "let's silence all critics" ideology of the radical left you so ardently espouse.

There's threads here about how the left wants to regulate speech to prevent disagreement. Thank you for providing examples.

[petch751]

Originally Posted by trlhiker

Show me proof of "all the voter fraud". Just because your side doesn't win doesn't mean there is voter fraud.

Exactly what Democrats don't want, a voter ID so it can't be proved

[Swampmonster]

Originally Posted by pnwmdk

Yes, it's the "let's silence all critics" ideology of the radical left you so ardently espouse.

There's threads here about how the left wants to regulate speech to prevent disagreement. Thank you for providing examples.

Playing the victim again I see,very unbecoming of you.

By not editing a quoted post,it gives both sides of the story so others can respond as well...its C-D 101

And you are not a "critic" by any stretch of the imagination,you are whining about a non-issue..who has silenced anyone as yet?Present the facts please..Links to proof?