Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-17-2014, 08:21 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 6,971,219 times
Reputation: 2177

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ih2puo View Post
Kinda like your precious insurance right?
Wrong. I have legal rights to enforcement of contract in terms of an insurer. It's a legally binding document and I can compel them to do as they contracted.

The ONLY thing you ever get from government is a politicians promises. You know, like "you can keep your insurance" and "you can keep your doctor".

Or, "I don't have the power to grant amnesty".

When was the last time you saw a politician lose in court and pay up because what they promised didn't happen?

Never.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-17-2014, 09:01 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,495,743 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
Looks like the Governor is throwing in the towel instead of crippling his state with taxes that would be higher than Barack Obama during his "Choom Gang" days.

"The legislation called for the administration to produce a plan for financing the Green Mountain Care system by 2013 but it wasn't completed until the last several days. Shumlin said it showed the plan would require an 11.5 percent payroll tax on businesses and an income tax separate from the one the state already has of up to 9.5 percent."


Two taxes.

21% total.


Twenty-one percent.


Be careful what you ask for, Single-Payer Sycophants.



Governor abandons single-payer health care plan
I've been following this. Their analysts recommended the high tax and projections have increased each year.
And this was planned for 2017...3 more years down the road and you just know it will increase even more.
Their only way was higher taxes yet the Governor and state legislature hesitated to actually put those new taxes forward as a bill..telling people they would look for other ways.

There is no other way. Single payer means everyone pays. Somehow they thought they could find someone else to pay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2014, 10:08 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntwrkguy1 View Post
Two taxes.

21% total.

Twenty-one percent.

Be careful what you ask for, Single-Payer Sycophants.
It would be higher than that in other States.

In the more populous States with greater demographic diversity, it would be 30+%, pushing 35%.

And still, there would be rationing, and waiting lists for months and years, and enough revenue would never be collected, so that it end up getting stripped down to nothing.

There's a reason why things are the way they are.

Unless and until people come to learn and understand how their system of medical care and health plan coverage evolved over the last 80 years there is no possible way to establish any viable solution.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prytania View Post
Yeah I hate to tell you but the quality of life in the UK is about as high as the US.

You can get around easily here, transit is clean, people are nice and the NHS covers everyone and you have the option of additional private insurance if you desire.

If I can stay here I will.
Then do it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prytania View Post
When I was in the US last, I had a deductible through my job of $3000.

The NHS is working out for me faaaaaaaaar better.



Source: CONCORD Study funded by the US Centers for Disease Control and the British National Health System.

Cancer survival in five continents: a worldwide population-based study (CONCORD) : The Lancet Oncology

The Lancet Oncology, Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages 730 - 756, August 2008


Talk is cheap.

When you get a real serious illness, you'll be on the first plane out of Heathrow or Gatwick begging someone in the US save you.


65 patients per million population UK
98 patients per million population in Canada
212 patients per million population in the US


Source
: Delay, Denial and Dilution: The Impact of NHS Rationing on Heart Disease and Cancer
IEA Health and Welfare Unit (London), David G. Green and Laura Casper.

The NHS in Britain is so great, they can't even afford to purchase, staff and maintain kidney dialysis equipment.


Lung cancer treatment waiting times and tumour growth.

Therefore, 21% of potentially curable patients became incurable on the waiting list. This study demonstrates that, even for the select minority of patients who have specialist referral and are deemed suitable for potentially curative treatment, the outcome is prejudiced by waiting times that allow tumour progression.

US National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health


That will be you.....on a waiting list..... dying.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Prytania View Post
Do you live in society? Do you not recognize a social good?
I recognize that Capital is both fixed and finite, and that it is limited.

I also recognize that the 3rd and 4th World States that the US and sock-puppet Britain refused to develop, are not being developed by BRICS.

I recognize, too, that as those emerging- and developing-States advance from ZERO Level Economies up through the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Level Economies through the end of this Century, that Capital will become even more scarce and limited.

Since Wages/Salaries in the US and UK could never possibly keep pace with the increasing Demand-pull Inflation, things will get very tight.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prytania View Post
Or do you realize that what is eating most of our tax money is defense spending where we spend more money than our closest competitor? Or that we spend more than most nations on the planet combined?
Do you realize the US (and sock-puppet Britain) is dependent upon the Petro-Dollar?


Anytime you have the desire to be just like Greece or Russia or Ukraine, or Belarus or any other 2nd World State, just close the bases and bring the troops home.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Prytania View Post
Its not dramatically different, the quality of life I would argue is better.
I lived and worked in the UK. Down in Queens Park outside London. I used to own a flat on Brondesbury Villas off of Kilburn High Road. I sold it six or seven years ago.

I liked it. Life is good there, but not for the reasons you think it is.

Gloating....

Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2014, 10:17 PM
 
Location: Ohio
24,621 posts, read 19,170,143 times
Reputation: 21738
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I've been following this. Their analysts recommended the high tax and projections have increased each year.
And this was planned for 2017...3 more years down the road and you just know it will increase even more.
Their only way was higher taxes yet the Governor and state legislature hesitated to actually put those new taxes forward as a bill..telling people they would look for other ways.

There is no other way. Single payer means everyone pays. Somehow they thought they could find someone else to pay.
Yes, indeed.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ih2puo View Post
Do you use your insurance? You are stealing from others!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ih2puo View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ih2puo View Post
Explain how using single payer is stealing but using insurance isn't.
Just as soon as you learn and understand what insurance is, I'll be happy explain it.

You can start your journey to become informed and educated with the Supreme Court's definition of insurance:

Insurance is a contract whereby for a stipulated consideration, one party undertakes to compensate the other for loss on a specific subject by specified perils.

Mull that over for a while. See if you can grasp the concepts.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ih2puo View Post
Either way others are paying your bills. One just cuts out the middleman.
Um, the "middleman" does not price-gouge Americans $55,000 for a $2,800 appendectomy. Hospitals do that.

The "middleman" does not price-gouge Americans $117,000 for assistant surgeon fees that really only cost $2,600, but hospitals do that.

The "middleman" does not price-gouge Americans $1 Million for a premature birth that probably only costs $265,000.......but hospitals do.

If you intend to cut out the "middleman" make sure you get the right one....and no, it isn't the "insurance companies."

Analyzing...


Mircea
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-17-2014, 10:49 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,892,870 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammertime33 View Post
You were saying?
So this means that Vermont should only need a single 8 per cent tax?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2014, 02:47 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,187,290 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
I've been following this. Their analysts recommended the high tax and projections have increased each year.
And this was planned for 2017...3 more years down the road and you just know it will increase even more.
Their only way was higher taxes yet the Governor and state legislature hesitated to actually put those new taxes forward as a bill..telling people they would look for other ways.

There is no other way. Single payer means everyone pays. Somehow they thought they could find someone else to pay.
This is the kind of healthcare I want in this country, we all should be paying for it and it should be available to everyone without the need to sign up for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2014, 02:57 AM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,899,643 times
Reputation: 4512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Prytania View Post
Yeah I hate to tell you but the quality of life in the UK is about as high as the US.

You can get around easily here, transit is clean, people are nice and the NHS covers everyone and you have the option of additional private insurance if you desire.

If I can stay here I will.
The UK's quality of life in terms of PPP ranks around South Carolina if we're talking just money. Now, so many people attribute public health care to a high quality of life that the UK is often seen as some super enlightened and wonderful place. The fact of the matter is that your average UK citizen is as well off economically as the average citizen of South Carolina....plus they have free basic health care. So that could be the difference.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2014, 04:31 AM
 
1,652 posts, read 2,550,211 times
Reputation: 1463
This is as much about the massive rebuke of Shumlin at the polls as the numbers themselves. Shulin very narrowly "beat" his moderate, republican challenger this year for Governor, in fact, it's not even totally settled yet. The unprecedented support for Scott Milne was a flat out rejection of Shumlin's rather tone-deaf plans and failures over the last few years here in the state.

Continuing to push single-payer, in light of that, was almost impossible.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2014, 05:11 AM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,499,682 times
Reputation: 11351
The tax situation in VT is so bad people are literally being taxed out of their homes and many town and school budgets are being rejected when voted on. Single payer would have bankrupted the state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-18-2014, 05:16 AM
 
1,652 posts, read 2,550,211 times
Reputation: 1463
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
The tax situation in VT is so bad people are literally being taxed out of their homes and many town and school budgets are being rejected when voted on. Single payer would have bankrupted the state.
Yup, many Vermonters I've talked to actually agree it's a the right plan for sometime in the future, but the economy in Vermont simply won't support it right now.

Shumlin already has a rep as being "anti-business" and a large number of Vermonters are already working multiple, low-paying jobs to make ends meet. To add the kind of extra tax burden these numbers indicate would cripple the economy here for a long time before the benefits were realized.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top