Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-27-2014, 02:36 PM
 
Location: Michigan
29,391 posts, read 55,602,856 times
Reputation: 22044

Advertisements

ANTHONY MOORE said For the past year, I’ve worked at a Burger King in Tampa, Florida, making $9 an hour. Taxes are taken right out of my paycheck like they are for most people in America.

But Burger King doesn’t want to pay its fair share. Burger King wants to be seen as an All-American brand, and it is happy to benefit from taxpayer subsidies.

More lethal than the Whopper: How Burger King pleases the 1 percent, screws its workers - Salon.com

 
Old 12-27-2014, 03:09 PM
 
2,752 posts, read 2,587,290 times
Reputation: 4046
Here's a hint.. when needing to support a family, don't take a job less then you need, then complain that you don't make enough..
 
Old 12-27-2014, 03:12 PM
 
Location: Eastern Colorado
3,887 posts, read 5,748,737 times
Reputation: 5386
Why is this a surprise? The United States has 1 of the highest corporate taxes in the world, and they tax US companies for income all over the world, many other countries do not. Eventually companies will find ways to minimize that tax, and moving abroad so that they only have to pay tax on the income actually earned in the United States is the easiest way to do that.

Also I have a hard time seeing where Burger King is based as an argument on why fast food workers deserve $15 an hour, it does nothing to add to that argument.

Now if the argument is that Burger King should stay in the US and the US government should reform the tax code to something more similar to the rest of the world, and than maybe in a better position to give raises we may have a discussion but that is not the point of the article at all.
 
Old 12-27-2014, 03:22 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,199 posts, read 9,087,687 times
Reputation: 13959
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrviking View Post
Here's a hint.. when needing to support a family, don't take a job less then you need, then complain that you don't make enough..
Or don't have family when you are NOT financially, emotionally and mentally ready for one.
 
Old 12-27-2014, 05:57 PM
 
906 posts, read 712,666 times
Reputation: 578
Quote:
Originally Posted by PierceMarx View Post
Yes, because people never lose their jobs or fall on hard times.
no of course not, everyone is perfect and if not, then who cares about them?
 
Old 12-27-2014, 06:03 PM
 
Location: North Dakota
10,349 posts, read 13,947,673 times
Reputation: 18268
Instead of worrying about Burger King's taxes I would be looking for a better job if I had two kids to support. Just sayin'.
 
Old 12-27-2014, 06:12 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
11,199 posts, read 9,087,687 times
Reputation: 13959
Quote:
Originally Posted by PierceMarx View Post
Yes, because people never lose their jobs or fall on hard times.
If a person is financially, mentally and emotionally ready to support a family then they will have an easier time pulling through when they experience hard times, etc.
 
Old 12-27-2014, 06:14 PM
 
Location: NJ
18,665 posts, read 19,972,963 times
Reputation: 7315
Ditto, WyoEagle. If I lacked marketable skills suited for earning enough for a family, I would NOT have kids at that point in time. To have them when you cannot raise them is incredibly selfish.
 
Old 12-27-2014, 06:26 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,585 posts, read 81,206,701 times
Reputation: 57821
Another typical worker without the skills or ambition to get a decent job, blaming his employer for trying to increase profits (as is the goal of any company). It's not BKs fault that he has kids without the income to support them. If he doesn't like working for $9 there he needs to find something better elsewhere, complaining about the company working to minimize expense and maximize profit isn't going to help his situation. I guess it's
easier then working to develop more marketable skills.
 
Old 12-27-2014, 06:49 PM
 
906 posts, read 712,666 times
Reputation: 578
more to life than work, reproduction shouldn't be dependent on money. money is a trap. life means more. reproduction means more.

people should start distributing their own forms of currency. oh wait. bitcoin lol. not surprised. we need more of that. let this money thing die. it's being abused.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:28 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top