Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You're right. That doesn't help the lower income families.. What would? Incentives to reinvest for corporations. Take the penalty out of bringing income back into the states with the provision that those funds be reinvested in growth. Create more jobs, not more welfare.
What you describe is more welfare for corporations and the already wealthy. American coorations are sitting on billions of capital right now. By the time more trillions in corporate welfare trickle down to the serfs, we simply stir our current stew of low pay for employees and obscene profits for wealthy chiselers and corporate interests.
As long as the smug rich deny our people living wages, government has to do something to keep people at work. If not, we most assuredly WILL create more welfare.
President Obama proposes higher taxes for couples making $250,000 a year.
When I was dating my ex, we just decided to not getting married. Financially, getting married when you both make decent income just doesn't make any sense.
Well, it does if you marry for Love and the many protections that it offers.
What you describe is more welfare for corporations and the already wealthy. By the time trillions in corporate welfare trickle down to the serfs, we simply stir our current stew of low pay for employees and obscene profits for wealthy chiselers and corporate interests.
And if that money remains out of the country to avoid tax consequences, how much will it help stimulate job growth?
Well, it does if you marry for Love and the many protections that it offers.
I know several couples who got married in all other ways except signing the legal documents. Name change, using the husband/wife term, ceremony, the works. Some of them got formally married years later when they needed something they had to do that to get. Anyway, "should or should we not file the formal papers with the government?" isn't a question anyone should have to ask.
What you describe is more welfare for corporations and the already wealthy. American coorations are sitting on billions of capital right now. By the time more trillions in corporate welfare trickle down to the serfs, we simply stir our current stew of low pay for employees and obscene profits for wealthy chiselers and corporate interests.
As long as the smug rich deny our people living wages, government has to do something to keep people at work. If not, we most assuredly WILL create more welfare.
Clue for you: forcing companies to pay a "living wage" to people whose job duties and required skillsets don't command a living wage in the free market is simply welfare paid for by the private sector.
Notice Obama didn't propose this in 2009 when it would have passed and he could have signed it into law.
He's a fraud.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
