Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You won't read these links because they are well-sourced, come from valid sources and don't include character assassinations on liberals and Al Gore, and don't reference the usual suspects like Judith Curry, Roy Spencer, or Richard Lindzen.
Those are not facts but conjecture based on wild-assed guesses.
Theory is not fact. Especially when it comes to this myth of AGW.
Is there some reason you think everyone needed to see your copying and pasting skills from a non-science pseudoskeptic conspiracy blog? Yet again?
I was going to respond to it, but it wouldn't make any difference.
His brain is unable to process that natural cycles have causes, and don't just happen magically.
It's a well established hoax. Period. Not all scientists agree. The left leaning "scientists" have arrived at a consensus which is not science), and they have used a faulty computer model.
This has been debated ad nauseam and has been proven to be a hoax. Get over it.
It seems that republicans have changed their tune on this hoax thing....
I don't care what some Republicans have said. It's a hoax, and most of us know it. It has been proven to be a hoax.
You only show that some Republicans are as easily duped and as gullible as anyone else who has believed this nonsense. It isn't a left/right issue. It's a truth or lie issue, and it has been proven to be a lie. There is no valid scientific data that supports it. Period. It's based on a faulty computer model. Actual data shows no significant warming of any kind over 50 years.
I don't care what some Republicans have said. It's a hoax, and most of us know it. It has been proven to be a hoax.
You only show that some Republicans are as easily duped and as gullible as anyone else who has believed this nonsense. It isn't a left/right issue. It's a truth or lie issue, and it has been proven to be a lie. There is no valid scientific data that supports it. Period. It's based on a faulty computer model. Actual data shows no significant warming of any kind over 50 years.
Then I guess you won't be afraid to show me that "actual data" then, right?
Of course there are facts. It's your choice not to see them I suppose.
When there are facts, I will read them.
Otherwise, keep your bad theory to yourself.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
