Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Seems like an attempt to distract from Obama's failure to deal with Islamic terror to me. Sort of like how a few years ago they declared that returning veterans were a major threat to American security:
This is nothing but politics, just like the other report was. These are Obama appointees trying to support the administration by pointing fingers at conservatives rather than at Islamic terrorists at a time when Obama has been particularly embarrassed by his ill-advised remarks about how ISIS was just the "JV team", got slammed for trying to reference the crusades from a thousand years ago in reference to terrorist attacks going on right now, got egg on his face after holding a ceremony to welcome home the "hero" Bergdahl who turned out to be a deserter, etc.
DHS has also called terrorist attacks "man caused disasters" and called the incident of a radical Muslim gunning down 13 people while shouting Allahu Akbar "workplace violence." Obama's DHS has a history of playing politics.
You have hit the nail on the Political Hammer. the Adminstration and Liberals know that their polices are not working and /conservatism is on the rise. So MLS is trying to paint a picture of those who object to Obama and the Socialist Left!
We have observe the Liberal think they have all the rights of Freedom this country offers. But does not apply to Conservatives.
You have hit the nail on the Political Hammer. the Adminstration and Liberals know that their polices are not working and /conservatism is on the rise. So MLS is trying to paint a picture of those who object to Obama and the Socialist Left!
We have observe the Liberal think they have all the rights of Freedom this country offers. But does not apply to Conservatives.
It does not have anything to do with Conservatives, so why do you associate them? It also does not seem to have anything to do with Obama. These guys think they should be free to not to obey laws, like traffic laws. That's not a conservative attitude, and no one claimed it was. Obama did not create traffic laws to restrict your freedoms.
Your attempt to associate these people with Conservatives is a lame attempt to play the victim card.
There's a presidential election on the horizon.
Republicans control both the Senate and the House in Congress.
So, let's scare the electorate with stories of right-wing (code for white Republicans) terrorism and extremism
on the rise!
Watch the liberal MSM jump on board with every nut case they can find highlighted on the evening news the closer we get to the election.
I read it as such to....however, one thing we must remember, and seriously, is, the fact, no matter what side of the coin they are from, there is nothing more dangerous then a radical....and there are radicals on both sides, of course....so....we all need to keep that in mind.....
I'm actually very fed up with our government....and now Bush is running, makes me sick.....
I think they are isolated nutcases. Yes, in US you are more likely to be attacked by a local nutcase than ISIS.
This story is pure hog wash. Just like the stories that were spread by the right about "no go zones" and attempting to spread fear. Here we have the left turning the tables and attempting to spread fear on right wing extremist groups and comparing them too ISIS .LMAO The story is full of holes when the report says the groups could number 300 thousand but then report that there have been 25 incidents over 5 friggin years by members. That is 5 incidents a year and how many of those had to do with law enforcement?
Seems like an attempt to distract from Obama's failure to deal with Islamic terror to me. Sort of like how a few years ago they declared that returning veterans were a major threat to American security:
This is nothing but politics, just like the other report was. These are Obama appointees trying to support the administration by pointing fingers at conservatives rather than at Islamic terrorists at a time when Obama has been particularly embarrassed by his ill-advised remarks about how ISIS was just the "JV team", got slammed for trying to reference the crusades from a thousand years ago in reference to terrorist attacks going on right now, got egg on his face after holding a ceremony to welcome home the "hero" Bergdahl who turned out to be a deserter, etc.
DHS has also called terrorist attacks "man caused disasters" and called the incident of a radical Muslim gunning down 13 people while shouting Allahu Akbar "workplace violence." Obama's DHS has a history of playing politics.
There is probably a lot to that.
We know the administration has a double standard on religion, based on their multiple recent comments. More double standards and diversion tactics are hardly surprising.
This story is pure hog wash. Just like the stories that were spread by the right about "no go zones" and attempting to spread fear. Here we have the left turning the tables and attempting to spread fear on right wing extremist groups and comparing them too ISIS .LMAO The story is full of holes when the report says the groups could number 300 thousand but then report that there have been 25 incidents over 5 friggin years by members. That is 5 incidents a year and how many of those had to do with law enforcement?
maybe, but maybe not....we must keep an open mind....b/c there surely are a whole lot of nuts walking around out there....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.