Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:30 PM
 
12,638 posts, read 8,950,522 times
Reputation: 7458

Advertisements

Screw California. Anyone with a brain abandoned that liberal cesspool long ago. When is "The Big One" gonna hit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:47 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,415,085 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trace21230 View Post
Screw California. Anyone with a brain abandoned that liberal cesspool long ago. When is "The Big One" gonna hit?
There's a lot of conservative thinking here. Nice weather. Vibrant economy. Close to the ocean and San Fran. Most of us just ignore the fringe progressives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 02:49 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,185,642 times
Reputation: 18824
Quote:
Originally Posted by Packard fan View Post
I've heard about Cochise having a bad time of it like you said.
If you're in a Southwestern State, you're in trouble water wise PERIOD! We're just too slow to face up to it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-05-2015, 10:25 PM
 
Location: Northridge/Porter Ranch, Calif.
24,508 posts, read 33,300,433 times
Reputation: 7622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ponderosa View Post
I suppose it depends on your definition. Regardless, the vast majority of the population is based in areas where annual evaporation greatly exceeds annual rainfall. Without irrigation, LA would be nothing but sagebrush scrub and native grasses - Albuquerque by the sea.
That's right. LA would be nothing but sagebrush scrub and native grasses. But not cactus and creosote because those are desert plants.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2015, 12:37 AM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,349 posts, read 5,125,268 times
Reputation: 6766
California (and the rest of the US really) is a bunch of idiots when it comes to water. If they would just slowly raise the prices when the reserves start to decline, use would decrease and we'd be back at equilibrium. I don't know why they can't figure that out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2015, 12:38 AM
 
Location: Taos NM
5,349 posts, read 5,125,268 times
Reputation: 6766
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertdetroiter View Post
If you're in a Southwestern State, you're in trouble water wise PERIOD! We're just too slow to face up to it.
No, just raise the prices and the stupid forms of agriculture will stop.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2015, 12:43 AM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,933,716 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P View Post
No, just raise the prices and the stupid forms of agriculture will stop.
In principle I agree with you, but in practice, the entity (be it state or local government) would never reduce the fees when the reservoirs were once again filled. They would simply spend the additional revenue and wait for the next drought so they could raise the rates yet again. Even local governments get greedy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2015, 12:54 AM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,524,704 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phil P View Post
California (and the rest of the US really) is a bunch of idiots when it comes to water. If they would just slowly raise the prices when the reserves start to decline, use would decrease and we'd be back at equilibrium. I don't know why they can't figure that out.
Not a bad idea, and I also wonder why they don't do it. I'm sure there's a reason, and I'd like to hear it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2015, 12:55 AM
 
9,763 posts, read 10,524,704 times
Reputation: 2052
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
In principle I agree with you, but in practice, the entity (be it state or local government) would never reduce the fees when the reservoirs were once again filled. They would simply spend the additional revenue and wait for the next drought so they could raise the rates yet again. Even local governments get greedy.
There are legislative remedies for this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-06-2015, 12:57 AM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,933,716 times
Reputation: 3416
Quote:
Originally Posted by nvxplorer View Post
There are legislative remedies for this.
Government fixing government? That certainly works well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top