Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-30-2015, 02:21 AM
 
Location: 20 years from now
6,454 posts, read 7,014,135 times
Reputation: 4663

Advertisements

"Aides to former President Bill Clinton helped start a Canadian charity that effectively shielded the identities of donors who gave more than $33 million that went to his foundation, despite a pledge of transparency when Hillary Rodham Clinton became secretary of state."

"The partnership, established in 2007, effectively shielded the identities of its donors — and the amount they gave — by allowing them to bundle their money together in the offshoot Canadian partnership before it was passed along to Clinton Foundation programs. The foundation, in turn, names only the partnership as the source of those funds."

Full Article Here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/30/us...=politics&_r=0



These two are a modern day Gambino Crime family.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2015, 02:56 AM
 
34,279 posts, read 19,388,318 times
Reputation: 17261
So.....the charity version of a superpac?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2015, 06:11 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,591,255 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
So.....the charity version of a superpac?
only going to the family of the sitting Secretary of State.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2015, 06:18 AM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,865,913 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshim View Post
"Aides to former President Bill Clinton helped start a Canadian charity that effectively shielded the identities of donors who gave more than $33 million that went to his foundation, despite a pledge of transparency when Hillary Rodham Clinton became secretary of state."

"The partnership, established in 2007, effectively shielded the identities of its donors — and the amount they gave — by allowing them to bundle their money together in the offshoot Canadian partnership before it was passed along to Clinton Foundation programs. The foundation, in turn, names only the partnership as the source of those funds."

Full Article Here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/30/us...=politics&_r=0



These two are a modern day Gambino Crime family.
I guess it would be strange to some, that many people who donate want to do so anonymously, rather than seek acclaim.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2015, 06:22 AM
 
30,075 posts, read 18,682,634 times
Reputation: 20895
Quote:
Originally Posted by itshim View Post
"Aides to former President Bill Clinton helped start a Canadian charity that effectively shielded the identities of donors who gave more than $33 million that went to his foundation, despite a pledge of transparency when Hillary Rodham Clinton became secretary of state."

"The partnership, established in 2007, effectively shielded the identities of its donors — and the amount they gave — by allowing them to bundle their money together in the offshoot Canadian partnership before it was passed along to Clinton Foundation programs. The foundation, in turn, names only the partnership as the source of those funds."

Full Article Here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/30/us...=politics&_r=0



These two are a modern day Gambino Crime family.
Funny, isn't it?

Yet EVERY DEMOCRAT who deplores organized crime celebrates the Clintons. The Clintons are in politics to amass wealth; they have been very successful in doing so.

The Clinton wealth has been accumulated in exchange for political favors which directly harm the US. That fact is ignored by the left for some reason or another. Keep in mind that three of Clinton's major actions in his presidency GUTTED the middle class and manufacturing sector, yet the left gives him a pass.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2015, 07:06 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,531,102 times
Reputation: 27720
Quote:
Originally Posted by greywar View Post
So.....the charity version of a superpac?
In the case of Clinton, it certainly seems so.

Gates uses his Foundation to institute changes.

If you go back through history you'll see people with money and power have used their Foundations to make changes.

They all operated as fronts.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2015, 07:24 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
A foreign money laundering scheme....
This doesn't look good for the DNC machine.
Bill is also involved.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2015, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,531,102 times
Reputation: 27720
Folks..nothing sticks to the Clintons. Whatever is thrown their way slides off their backs and fades into memory.

Oh they'll fix up their Foundation and will improve it so that incidents like this will not happen again.
They just didn't have enough layers of obfuscation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2015, 05:24 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,663,022 times
Reputation: 18521
Foreign money laundering scheme....
Talk about the Koch brothers funding an election.
The Clintons have the world funding theirs.
Foreign nations, buying elections.....
At least Koch brothers are Americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-07-2015, 06:18 AM
 
19,573 posts, read 8,528,817 times
Reputation: 10096
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Folks..nothing sticks to the Clintons. Whatever is thrown their way slides off their backs and fades into memory.

Oh they'll fix up their Foundation and will improve it so that incidents like this will not happen again.
They just didn't have enough layers of obfuscation.
It sticks to Hillary. That is not the issue however. The people that support her have no objection to her being covered with slime. In fact, her untrustworthiness is apparently a strength in their eyes, as it shows her as being strong enough to overcome the obstacles commonly imposed on candidates by the Constitution or the expectations of human decency.

Just as with Barack Obama, they don't regard his constant lying or law breaking as a weakness, but as a strength.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:16 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top