Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Saddam had a good handle on them in Iraq. Dubya said he didn't want anyone to focus on anything else except Iraq. You do remember him not following through with Afghanistan. don't you.
You do remember Saddam not following through on agreements and UN mandates for years too right?
The only plan I want to combat ISIS is a plan to do nothing.
If that's failure, hooray for failure.
obama also enjoys being a failure, so you're in good company... I beleive it's the democratic party's unofficial motto, we strive for failure, and they are extremely successful at it...
Frankly, ISIS loves people such as yourself who attempt to build on irrational fear and anxiety.
You should get paid for fronting their PR. Talk about the Bogeyman.
You are correct, all those people they have beheaded aren't really dead and it really isn't ISIS's goal to take over the world, with America being first in it's gun site... Yes, you definitely qualify to be a democrat...
We can only hope ISIS takes out all of the democrats first and makes the world a better place....
Stamp out ignorance, behead a democrat....
I thought Ike was a great president, but his foreign policy on containment of communism proved to be pretty fruitless and expensive in the coming decades.
Suppose we will have to agree to disagree what a "realist" is.
I suggest you google realism and idealism in foreign policy. Idealists tend to emphasize human rights and democracy while realists do not. Idealists tended to be optimistic about the Arab Spring while realists saw the pitfalls.
And it's fair to note his successes are all failures.
I currently work with a bunch of zeroes. They do not impress me, and neither does o.
What folks fail to realize or actually miss are the people shaping his policy failures. They too see all they do as a success. They've all bought into his sway. They would fall on the sword if he asked.
Given the way men and women gain power in America, I cannot respect their efforts because each has an agenda or desires to build a legacy.
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,387 posts, read 54,651,766 times
Reputation: 40877
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest
If Saddam had a good handle on them in Iraq, then why did Clinton change the US policy to out him?
WHY did that policy NOT change after 9/11? Shouldn't eliminating those responsible for 9/11 have become priority #1 on that date? And we KNOW Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11 as the Dick rarely if ever missed an opportunity to tell us.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
