Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Yawn. Depends on the content. At a guess they may be nothing of interest. And may have been excluded as being personal emails between her and a friend, and NOT work related.
If its 15 emails discussing lunch plans I dont care, and no one should.
BUT....
If they are relevant, and of interest thats another thing.
Until we know, this is pretty dull.
From the OP's link;
"Her longtime confidant and adviser Sidney Blumenthal, responding two weeks ago to a subpoena from the House committee investigating the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, gave it dozens of emails he had exchanged with Mrs. Clinton when she was in office. Mr. Blumenthal did not work at the State Department at the time, but he routinely provided her with intelligence memos about Libya, some with dubious information, which Mrs. Clinton circulated to her deputies.
State Department officials then crosschecked the emails from Mr. Blumenthal with the ones Mrs. Clinton had handed over and discovered that she had not provided nine of them and portions of six others."
Yawn. Depends on the content. At a guess they may be nothing of interest. And may have been excluded as being personal emails between her and a friend, and NOT work related.
If its 15 emails discussing lunch plans I dont care, and no one should.
BUT....
If they are relevant, and of interest thats another thing.
Until we know, this is pretty dull.
Don't you know how they know? Because they have the e-mails of the other person with whom she communicated.
Yawn. Depends on the content. At a guess they may be nothing of interest. And may have been excluded as being personal emails between her and a friend, and NOT work related.
If its 15 emails discussing lunch plans I dont care, and no one should.
BUT....
If they are relevant, and of interest thats another thing.
Until we know, this is pretty dull.
Yawn?
You are so partisan you are willing to yawn away lawlessness as long as the person has a D after their name?
No wonder why our country is going down the tubes.
The NEW YORK TIMES agrees that the emails are work related and should have been turned over. Hillary said she turned over all work related emails. She did not.
Now, we know that Hillary failed to turn over all of her work related emails as she said she did. We know this, because there are emails at the State Department from her private email that weren't turned over and they are of a delicate matter as the relationship with Blumenthal is examined. So much for Hillary erring on the side of transparency.
I wonder how much the LSM will report on it with complete follow ups?
"While CBS and NBC gave at least full reports on the new developments, ABC’s Good Morning America spent only 24 seconds on the story. Fill-in newsreader Dan Harris reported the following (after a lead-in from substitute co-host David Muir): - See more at: CBS, NBC Fret Missing Hillary E-Mails Is
I actually think that most democrats who aren't ignorant of the current events are actually relieved that Hillary destroyed her emails and wiped her server rather than be transparent and honest. Just like they are relieved that the IRS destroyed email tapes.
It is truly sad that most democrats clearly put partisan gain above rule of law and honest government that doesn't target citizens for their free speech.
It is more likely that most democrats just see this as partisan B.S. Both Clinton and the IRS have been investigated to death for years and yet you guys have come up with nothing.
Now you are arguing that 15 emails out of 55,000+ are going to make your case( and by the way, they have the emails, Blumenthal sent them, they just didnt get them from Hillary, what did you guys think cross check meant ?????????)
It is more likely that most democrats just see this as partisan B.S. Both Clinton and the IRS have been investigated to death for years and yet you guys have come up with nothing.
Now you are arguing that 15 emails out of 55,000+ are going to make your case( and by the way, they have the emails, Blumenthal sent them, they just didnt get them from Hillary, what did you guys think cross check meant ?????????)
It means they get to keep this non-story alive a little bit longer. Which is their only motivation here.
It is more likely that most democrats just see this as partisan B.S. Both Clinton and the IRS have been investigated to death for years and yet you guys have come up with nothing.
Now you are arguing that 15 emails out of 55,000+ are going to make your case( and by the way, they have the emails, Blumenthal sent them, they just didnt get them from Hillary, what did you guys think cross check meant ?????????)
You choose to see it as partisan BS, because Hillary has a D after her name and is the D front-runner for 2016.
You are fine with her lying on this issue repeatedly. You are fine with her circumventing the law. You are fine with her wiping her server. You are fine with all of these shenanigans.
What is sickening, is that you are even fine with the IRS targeting people for their free speech and then covering it up with accidental email losses of several IRS employees. Everyone under investigation loses their emails.
You don't want a democracy run by laws and protecting freedoms with due process.
You want a Banana Republic that espouses your view points and counter viewpoints are suppressed.
It is more likely that most democrats just see this as partisan B.S. Both Clinton and the IRS have been investigated to death for years and yet you guys have come up with nothing.
Now you are arguing that 15 emails out of 55,000+ are going to make your case( and by the way, they have the emails, Blumenthal sent them, they just didnt get them from Hillary, what did you guys think cross check meant ?????????)
" Both Clinton and the IRS have been investigated to death for years and yet you guys have come up with nothing."
An investigation is SUPPOSED to look at ALL the evidence.
It is kinda' hard to look at evidence if you don't have it.
A simple question, If they are so innocent, what all the trouble they have gone through to hid and get rid of all the evidence?
" Both Clinton and the IRS have been investigated to death for years and yet you guys have come up with nothing."
An investigation is SUPPOSED to look at ALL the evidence.
It is kinda' hard to look at evidence if you don't have it.
A simple question, If they are so innocent, what all the trouble they have gone through to hid and get rid of all the evidence?
The problem is that most Democrats realize that you are 100% correct. It is not a coincidence that everyone under investigation at the IRS all had the emails get accidentally erased and so forth. It is that Democrats like him are 100% fine with Democrat corruption that attacks the other side.
"Democrats may roll their eyes, go ahead, but the Hillary Clinton private emails controversy now has new legs.
The Democratic front-runner has only herself to blame. After the House Select Benghazi Committee released some new emails this past week, the Obama State Dept. was forced to admit it was not in possession of some Clinton emails that clearly discuss Department business...
Now, will some Republicans blow this out of proportion or wander into the realm of conspiracy theory?
Perhaps, even probably, but as Democrats accuse them of being partisan or reckless, remember this: This would not be an issue if Clinton hadn't erased her email server and if she followed the wishes of her boss, Obama about how to handle cabinet-level emails."
This is an issue, because Hillary did not follow the spirit of the law.
This is an issue, because Hillary was caught lying multiple times on why she avoided following the law properly.
This is an issue, because Hillary claimed to have handed over every single work related email and erred on the side of transparency and we now know this is not true.
This is an issue, because Hillary then deleted her server clean to avoid transparency.
This is 100% Hillary's fault for deliberately avoiding transparency and then destroying government property (which her work related emails are).
The problem is that most Democrats realize that you are 100% correct. It is not a coincidence that everyone under investigation at the IRS all had the emails get accidentally erased and so forth. It is that Democrats like him are 100% fine with Democrat corruption that attacks the other side.
"Democrats may roll their eyes, go ahead, but the Hillary Clinton private emails controversy now has new legs.
The Democratic front-runner has only herself to blame. After the House Select Benghazi Committee released some new emails this past week, the Obama State Dept. was forced to admit it was not in possession of some Clinton emails that clearly discuss Department business...
Now, will some Republicans blow this out of proportion or wander into the realm of conspiracy theory?
Perhaps, even probably, but as Democrats accuse them of being partisan or reckless, remember this: This would not be an issue if Clinton hadn't erased her email server and if she followed the wishes of her boss, Obama about how to handle cabinet-level emails."
This is an issue, because Hillary did not follow the spirit of the law.
This is an issue, because Hillary was caught lying multiple times on why she avoided following the law properly.
This is an issue, because Hillary claimed to have handed over every single work related email and erred on the side of transparency and we now know this is not true.
This is an issue, because Hillary then deleted her server clean to avoid transparency.
This is 100% Hillary's fault for deliberately avoiding transparency and then destroying government property (which her work related emails are).
It wouldn't be an issue if she had used the gov't provided email system as required. Instead she used her OWN email system.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
