So two guys go into a Walmart... (weapons, military, parties)

[r small]

Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest

Or ISIS recruits lol

Yeah, either way. If an armed citizen or LEO would have taken these idiots out it would have fine with me.

[brownbagg]

They should of been arrested not on a gun law but on being stupid.

[ChrisFromChicago]

Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest

It should be up to Walmart to decide. I doubt it would be store policy to allow such conduct.

You going to argue with two guys with guns about "freedom of a business to deny patrons" are hide in a back room?

[Frank DeForrest]

Originally Posted by ChrisFromChicago

You going to argue with two guys with guns about "freedom of a business to deny patrons" are hide in a back room?

I dont work at Walmart.

[katzpaw]

Originally Posted by Delahanty

That picture, which represents how the vast majority exercise that right has nothing to do with the story.

...which tells me that the "reporter" doesn't even agree with what those two in the picture are doing.

Do you agree with what they were doing?

"Police said Saucier “engaged in the lawful open carry of a pump-action shotgun,” but he then loaded the shotgun and pumped it in front of witnesses, creating a breach of the peace."

"Terrified employees huddled in a safe room while the man loaded and racked the 12-gauge"

[rbohm]

Originally Posted by brownbagg

They should of been arrested not on a gun law but on being stupid.

Originally Posted by katzpaw

Do you agree with what they were doing?
"Police said Saucier “engaged in the lawful open carry of a pump-action shotgun,” but he then loaded the shotgun and pumped it in front of witnesses, creating a breach of the peace."

yep, the legal carry of a shotgun is not the problem. its when he loaded and racked the slide that created the crime of brandishing. there are a number of offenses they could have been arrested on.

[middle-aged mom]

Originally Posted by Rakin

If you're going to write an article about guns you should know those are not shotguns.

The article says the picture is unrelated to the incident.

[middle-aged mom]

Originally Posted by Versatile

I can't walk for **** let alone run. Were i armed and they started jacking rounds near me; i would have done my best to make a good showing of myself.

No doubt in my mind a court would agree that you had reasonable grounds to defend yourself.

[keepingquiet]

Originally Posted by Delahanty

That picture, which represents how the vast majority exercise that right has nothing to do with the story.

...which tells me that the "reporter" doesn't even agree with what those two in the picture are doing.

It told me that the person who chose the picture, most likely not the reporter, typed "two guys with guns in a store" into a image database.

[whogo]

A 12 year old kid got killed by the cops for less.