Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The rabble want to throw threats first, they should know how they'll be dealt with.
LOL. Better look at history.... they do win every now and then.
Quote:
Without the government to take from us, the have nots really are a helpless lot
of wasted space.
Right.... We'd be better off as an agrarian nation, like before industrialization caused the massive transition from rural living to urban living. Sucks technology and progress can be a cruel mistress and cause massive shifts in labor.
Quote:
Isolated acts of violence against us can be handled at the most individual of levels.
How did these people survive in the past? Through charitable organizations and their local churches. Ooops, can't use the churches any more, they're either illegal, immoral or fattening by today's progressive standards.
A bit of reading for regressives that believe such nonsense:
"The just-world hypothesis or just-world fallacy is the cognitive bias (or assumption) that a person's actions are inherently inclined to bring morally fair and fitting consequences to that person, to the end of all noble actions being eventually rewarded and all evil actions eventually punished. In other words, the just-world hypothesis is the tendency to attribute consequences to—or expect consequences as the result of—a universal force that restores moral balance. This belief generally implies that in the existence of cosmic justice, destiny, divine providence, desert, stability, or order, and has high potential to result in fallacy, especially when used to rationalize people's misfortune on the grounds that they "deserve" it."
We now return you to your regularly scheduled, ignorant, far-right wing bashing of the poor. Stay tuned long enough, and you may get some claims of being religious and holy thrown in by the same people voting for their fellow man to die!
Wow - the poor vote for the party that hasn't basically committed to killing them. Big shock there. So surprising.
Of course, given the sheer number of dirt poor Republicans that keep electing idiot regressives year after year, an argument could be made that the poor people on welfare that are being bashed are actually *smarter* - at least they aren't directly voting against their own futures, like so many people in this nation are!
But, hey - keep on voting Republican and hating the poor. It can surely never happen to you, or so says every regressive. No, no - they are too smart, too hard working - it can't happen to them.
And amid every homeless shelter, you'll find plenty of ruined lives of people who once believed the same thing.
And a Democrat paying them to vote a few times with a bottle of rotgut.
Also, what happens when Dems run out of other peoples money?
We have a fiat currency silly. But hey.... go tell those baby boomers they'll need to pay for their own healthcare and they need to cover their retirement. See what happens when you tell them they can't use young people's money.
That would be both parties. I have never seen a politician murder anyone.
There is suspicion that Vince Foster was murdered.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.