Quote:
Originally Posted by residinghere2007
Maybe because of my work with public unions I just don't agree that they run anything. As stated, they do not run an organization. They don't have control of the finances and whoever controls the money, runs the show.
But maybe I am just naive in this. But honestly, in what way can a union actually even partially run a company? If a company has a good policy book and decent collective bargaining reps themselves then there is no way that a company can be run by a union.
Unions ask for things and ask for support mostly in regards to salary and benefits and the rights to employment hearings but companies have the right to flat out deny or just negotiate salary and benefits and they also have to agree to employee grievance procedures with the unions and I just don't see how a union in todays day and age especially can hold any company hostage or "run" anything.
|
I think it mostly manifests when things are going badly or changes are forthcoming and they want to resist them.
The most obvious example would be the ability to strike.
For the public unions it really would depend IMO how politically connected they were.
I think we can both agree that it's probably just too varied and complex of a landscape for any general rule to hold true.