Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 08-20-2015, 07:34 AM
 
26,583 posts, read 15,149,248 times
Reputation: 14711

Advertisements

Obama owns QE Trickle Down. Every Fed Pick Obama has made has been to a QE Trickle Down supporter and it didn't start until he won in 2008 and met with Bernanke.

Obama's QE Trickle Down increased wealth inequality.


The Richest 1 Percent Have Captured 121 Percent Of Income Gains During The Recovery | ThinkProgress

How Quantitative Easing Helps the Rich and Soaks the Rest of Us - Reason.com

Bernanke's QE3; A Helping Hand To Wall St., Not Main St.

Guest post explains QE3 – quantitative easing | Roanoke Free Press

Trickle-down quantitative easing: James Saft | Reuters

Quantitative Easing is Trickle-Down Economics
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 08-20-2015, 07:38 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,960,998 times
Reputation: 8365
Bernanke was Bush's pick, and QE started when Bush was in office, but Obama re-appointing him shows that the real power in this country lies with the Federal Reserve. Maybe not much longer but 100+ years was way to long anyway for a private institution to have a monopoly on printing money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2015, 07:39 AM
 
5,113 posts, read 5,982,615 times
Reputation: 1748
Have you ever wondered what the Fed is and how it became?

Here is a good explanation ...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=20&v=Dba9OY0QatU
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2015, 07:41 AM
 
26,583 posts, read 15,149,248 times
Reputation: 14711
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
Bernanke was Bush's pick, and QE started when Bush was in office, but Obama re-appointing him shows that the real power in this country lies with the Federal Reserve.
QE did not start until Bernanke met with Obama and discussed it after the 2008 election. Obama then quickly reappointed him. Obama then picked QE supporter Yellen. All of Obama's lower Fed picks were also to QE supporters.

I am sorry, but Obama owns QE Trickle Down. Stop making excuses for Obama's actions. Obama enabled its existence and could have stopped it with making different picks. Just like Romney said he would remove QE Bernanke, Obama via actions said he would reward them.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2015, 07:46 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,695,534 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crossfire600 View Post
St. Louis Fed official: No evidence QE boosted economy

I disagree! It made the wealthy UBER, FILTHY WEALTHY!! In fact it created the largest income gap in history! Well done.. The really scary part is they have nothing left for the coming crash..
Exactly, the banks handling the QE transactions got filthy rich.

I remember a time when the liberals on the left, you know, the OWS types, were completely opposed to crony capitalism, now they embrace it because a democrat is in the White House. Where's the outrage on the left over this? Where's their outrage over the runaway spending and an $18 trillion debt? <crickets>
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2015, 07:50 AM
 
14,292 posts, read 9,695,534 times
Reputation: 4254
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
Bernanke was Bush's pick, and QE started when Bush was in office, but Obama re-appointing him shows that the real power in this country lies with the Federal Reserve. Maybe not much longer but 100+ years was way to long anyway for a private institution to have a monopoly on printing money.
Poor helpless Obama, the guy can subvert the US Constitution and go it alone, bypassing our laws, the Constitution and bypassing Congress, but he just can't handle the Federal Reserve, and is forced to continue any and all Bush policies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2015, 07:50 AM
 
Location: Philadelphia
11,998 posts, read 12,960,998 times
Reputation: 8365
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Exactly, the banks handling the QE transactions got filthy rich.

I remember a time when the liberals on the left, you know, the OWS types, were completely opposed to crony capitalism, now they embrace it because a democrat is in the White House. Where's the outrage on the left over this? Where's their outrage over the runaway spending and an $18 trillion debt? <crickets>
We're here, and we haven't supported Obama since 2009.

OWS was attacked by law enforcement, the media, and establishment types on both sides of the aisle.

Funny how some choose to view things.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2015, 07:54 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,308,825 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Exactly, the banks handling the QE transactions got filthy rich.

I remember a time when the liberals on the left, you know, the OWS types, were completely opposed to crony capitalism, now they embrace it because a democrat is in the White House. Where's the outrage on the left over this? Where's their outrage over the runaway spending and an $18 trillion debt? <crickets>
OWS started while Obama was in office. The OWS types are now supporting Sanders. OWS got nowhere because the larger segment of (D)'s that had complained for years about crony capitalism dismissed them because Obama was in office.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2015, 08:06 AM
 
26,583 posts, read 15,149,248 times
Reputation: 14711
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
Bernanke was Bush's pick, and QE started when Bush was in office, but Obama re-appointing him shows that the real power in this country lies with the Federal Reserve. Maybe not much longer but 100+ years was way to long anyway for a private institution to have a monopoly on printing money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2e1m5a View Post
We're here, and we haven't supported Obama since 2009.
You are supporting Obama.

You just made excuses for Obama's own actions. You don't want Obama to be held accountable for making EVERY SINGLE Fed Pick to a QE Trickle Down Supporter.

Obama owns QE Trickle Down and you denying Obama's involvement in it is supporting him.



Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Poor helpless Obama, the guy can subvert the US Constitution and go it alone, bypassing our laws, the Constitution and bypassing Congress, but he just can't handle the Federal Reserve, and is forced to continue any and all Bush policies.
It really isn't a Bush policy, it only existed the last month of Bush's presidency and Bernanke met with president-elect Obama before implementing it - not Bush.

Obama then went on to make every fed pick a QE supporter.

Obama owns QE Trickle Down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 08-20-2015, 08:12 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,368,221 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by OICU812 View Post
Exactly, the banks handling the QE transactions got filthy rich.

I remember a time when the liberals on the left, you know, the OWS types, were completely opposed to crony capitalism, now they embrace it because a democrat is in the White House. Where's the outrage on the left over this? Where's their outrage over the runaway spending and an $18 trillion debt? <crickets>
Roughly HALF of American workers are either directly or indirectly are invested in the stock market. Virtually all of those folks have seen gains due to QE. In addition, more than half of all Americans are homeowners - and they also have seen their wealth increase as their home values rose. That's a LOT of people who have benefited from something you seem to think only benefited the banks.
Sounds to me like you are just bitter that you weren't smart enough to put money in the stock market or the housing market. Maybe because you were one of those misinformed "doom and gloom" folks who believed that the dollar was going to collapse, gold was going to hit $5,000/ounce and the "shadow inventory" of foreclosed homes was going to drive home prices down to the point where you could pick up a house anywhere in the country for nearly free.
How'd that work out?


Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top