Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Why does the world have to shelter refugees from Africa and the ME? Why can't they fight like we did the British?
Globalists orchestrate these lax immigration policies to weaken national identities that simultaneoulsy embolden tyrants on their home turfs. There is an organization to this.
Americans took up arms against each other and fought a bitterly long war. Given that we've all seen the violence these refugees are capable of against armed police of many European countries it would seem logical they could grab a rifle and take a side in their own country.
Here's the deal though; they do not want to risk their lives to get rid of one tyrant only to have another replace him. Whether it be your garden variety dictator or a pack of religious azzhats steeped in the 12th century, they see no ultimate gain for the risk involved.
Every other nation that has fought for it's independence has had a common desire among it's people to install something better....the middle east defies reason when it comes to this conundrum. Too many see an improvement in regressing backwards.
Why does the world have to shelter refugees from Africa and the ME? Why can't they fight like we did the British?
Some are, some are not. Did every (future) American alive at the time fight in the War of Independence - including the women and children? Also, it is possible that the refugees don't want to fight in the war because there are multiple groups of belligerents and they don't want to fight for any of them, or know which one to fight for or support.
Why does the world have to shelter refugees from Africa and the ME? Why can't they fight like we did the British?
Their own government is doing most of the killing....These people don't have anything to fight with, unless you think throwing rocks at tanks and jets would help....
Why didn't your ancestors stay in their mother countries and fix them instead of running to this country?
not apples to apples. someone already posted this. back then this country was largely desolate. The Europeans who came here to escape religious persecution didn't come and expect to be provided for. they worked their a**es off to build.
Again, not apples to apples.
And perhaps if civilized nations must be forced to provide for these people, maybe civilized countries should take over the dumps that were left behind. if these people are so evil and corrupt that they cannot govern their own, then they need to be managed. Would you prefer that approach?
All muslims and mexicans need to get out, go home and take your countries back, cause we don't want you here screwing ours up anymore.
Are the muslims andmexician screwing up our own country are is it the american liberal government that giving it away, i remember somebody said rather fight them over there than here, then he invites 200k to fight over here.
Aahhh yes Paul revere the silversmith " the British are coming " I believe is the term lol
I was trying to think of a more recent battle not 200+ years ago
But on the subject as a proud Brit I'm glad " we got our asses kicked " as America might not have been the great country it is today but I'm glad there's still a British influence with city/state names etc
Back to the original question I think your right I'd love to turn the refugees back as we are already overflowing
Actually he said "The Redcoats are coming!". If he had said "The British are Coming", the colonials would have said "But we are British".
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.