Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-22-2015, 10:16 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,296 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraC View Post
I want my state to be able to capture rain water and sell it to other states. We get a lot of rain. Maybe we could have a water pipeline.

These states are the wettest based on average precipitation per year:

Hawaii
Louisiana
Mississippi
Alabama
Florida
Tennessee
Georgia
Arkansas
Connecticut and NC (tie)
South Carolina

Rainiest States in the US - Current Results

There is no population explosion. Populations are decreasing.
Assuming it could be accomplished it still does not address the wastefulness of agriculture and other industries. Population has exceeded what can be supported in many areas without major reform in water use.

Water beneath the ground and above are really one and the same, rainfall needs to replenish the acquifers. Anytime we try to improve on nature it doesn't turn out well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-22-2015, 10:16 AM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,636,151 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
The problems facing the Desert SW & California isn't a lack of water, its misuse of water appropriation. I.e., in Arizona about 70% of that water goes into agriculture, a lot of the agriculture is then exported out of the U.S. California has the same problem.
The problem with these places are people who move there, but want to live a lifestyle that is incompatible with the environment. That is the issue.

If people want to live in the desert, they are going to have to give up the green lawns, and everything else that you would otherwise never see in those places.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Long Island
57,296 posts, read 26,217,746 times
Reputation: 15646
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJJersey View Post
Massive agra factories and bottled water companies are wasting most of it. Regardless, we should be working on less expensive ways to desalinize sea water.
Australia installed desalinization plants in just about every territory about 5 years ago and now they sit idle at quite a cost.

Nocookies | The Australian

Last edited by Goodnight; 12-22-2015 at 10:36 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 10:41 AM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,961,493 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
The problem with these places are people who move there, but want to live a lifestyle that is incompatible with the environment. That is the issue.

If people want to live in the desert, they are going to have to give up the green lawns, and everything else that you would otherwise never see in those places.
You're still oversimplifying it. Water use for lawns is a drop in the bucket. Water exists in these places, Phoenix exists at the confluence of three different rivers that were damned for Ranching and big AG. The area was a riparian habitat and still is in small locations where the rivers still trickle like the San Pedro or Gila. Western water policy is more extensive than simply cutting back on things like Lawns.

You ignore both facts and the post, stopping lawns in Phoenix, for example, would amount to a 5% reduction in water supplies for AZ at most, switching to drip irrigation alone would easily surpass that figure.

There is more to the desert than the dirt and since most desert cities are located in valleys up against large mountains with snow fall, the water supplies are derived from snow melt. It isn't incompatible. I do agree that people should conserve, but with heat islands and the need for shade, there is no problem with drought tolerant plants used.

The Sonoran Desert is home to various natural grasses that are drought tolerant. It is home to various tree species that are used.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 11:39 AM
 
52,431 posts, read 26,636,151 times
Reputation: 21097
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGMotorsport64 View Post
You're still oversimplifying it.
Nope. You simply don't care to address it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 11:41 AM
 
13,303 posts, read 7,872,015 times
Reputation: 2144
I didn't read this thread, but I do know that oil is thicker than water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 11:42 AM
 
8,081 posts, read 6,961,493 times
Reputation: 7983
Quote:
Originally Posted by WaldoKitty View Post
Nope. You simply don't care to address it.
It was addressed try reading.

By your logic because electricity doesn't occur naturally where you live and is imported via a grid that you will simply have to do without it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 11:46 AM
 
26,497 posts, read 15,079,792 times
Reputation: 14655
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Bottled water is a drop in the bucket, so to speak. Agriculture is the big drain. Hard to grow crops that people need to eat without water. Then add the crops grown for alternative fuels and feeding livestock, and any drought has a huge effect.
We need agriculture to feed humans. Is the answer discouraging population growth or finding better ways to get clean drinking water?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 11:51 AM
 
45,227 posts, read 26,450,499 times
Reputation: 24985
Water should be privatized and priced in accordance with supply and demand. That would eliminate much of the frivolous usage or wasting on unprofitable ventures.
Price controls create shortages.

Also, what impact does the ethanol mandate have on water usage? It's past time to end that scam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-22-2015, 12:35 PM
 
Location: DC
6,848 posts, read 7,995,391 times
Reputation: 3572
Quote:
Originally Posted by uggabugga View Post
how much per gallon would desalination cost if one were forced to use windmills? likely a lot more than your quoted price above.
Nope. Swing and a miss by the t-bagger team.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:46 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top