Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-08-2016, 02:49 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,231 posts, read 19,225,735 times
Reputation: 14916

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
Who told them to leave or die? Not the government.
Threats of violence? Not from the government.
If anything the month long occupation has shown the patience of the government in seeking a non-confrontational end.
If the government had wanted to use force the whole thing would have been over on January 3rd.

 
Old 02-08-2016, 03:27 PM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,135,138 times
Reputation: 13096
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
If the government had wanted to use force the whole thing would have been over on January 3rd.
If it had a state building in many states, a SWAT team would have cleared the building in the first couple days.
 
Old 02-08-2016, 03:44 PM
 
4,713 posts, read 3,474,981 times
Reputation: 6304
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
Probably.

When you think about it...a bunch of guys holed up in a bird watching center...it all sounds really homoerotic, doesn't it?
"The Birdcage"?!
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:00 PM
 
19,724 posts, read 10,135,138 times
Reputation: 13096
Gay caballeros?
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:06 PM
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,600,694 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
Oh, goddammitsomuch.

This, kids, is why we don't bring real guns if we want to play "militia", mmkay?

Kinda settles it for the Bundys. The next Federal institution they're going to occupy will have the word "Penitentiary" in it.
Right or wrong of it, they were headed there any way.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...egon-standoff/

I understand the message from the occupation.

Federal Land Ownership: Is It Constitutional? | Tenth Amendment Center
Quote:
...the Constitution does not authorize permanent land-grabs by the federal government.
People have been binding their own hands with the chains labeled freedom for over 100 years now. They don't see where that settled then effects future prospect to liberty. Same as today, the legal maneuvers of the federal government granted by congress sealed by the Presidents signature, will effect present day liberty 100 years from now.

The Constitution gives to the people the freedom to choose the 'type' of government they wish to have govern them. 250 years later ... how are we doing? Restrictions placed on farmers and ranchers to produce will place restrictions on our food sources that will lead to the government becoming the only source of sustenance. Just saying ... 20/20 does not have to come from hindsight. Then again, maybe it does.
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:15 PM
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,600,694 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
If the government had wanted to use force the whole thing would have been over on January 3rd.
They were all boxed in with no where to go. They could be waited out with the same outcome as with the use of force. Waiting them out saved face for the government, but it doesn't make the governmental laws right.
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:28 PM
 
Location: CO
2,172 posts, read 1,454,726 times
Reputation: 972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellis Bell View Post
I understand the message from the Tenth Amendment Center.

"We'll cite the study -- and just cherrypick it."

Anyone capable of critical thinking is welcome to it:

Federal Land Retention and the Constitution's Property Clause: The Original Understanding

To be fair,

Quote:
Unfortunately, commentators on neither side have done a particularly good job of uncovering the original meaning of the Property Clause.
Quote:
Considered from the vantage point of original meaning, both the conservative and liberal interpretations of the "other Property" portion of the Property Clause are partly correct.
 
Old 02-08-2016, 04:56 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
37,231 posts, read 19,225,735 times
Reputation: 14916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellis Bell View Post
They were all boxed in with no where to go. They could be waited out with the same outcome as with the use of force. Waiting them out saved face for the government, but it doesn't make the governmental laws right.
The government never intended to use violence until the were forced into it. Finicum fought the Law, and the Law won. That will forever be his epitaph.


The cooler heads in the two vehicles are still alive because they knew what would happen if they went for their guns. If you want to change the laws, fine. Many do. There are a lot of them I would change. But that is done by legal maneuvers in the courts and through the voting booth, not by armed thugs hijacking a government building and issuing demands. We are a nation of laws, designed to protect all of us. You can't just pick and choose the ones you want to obey, as the Birdhouse Boys found out.
 
Old 02-08-2016, 05:04 PM
 
Location: Living rent free in your head
42,850 posts, read 26,301,017 times
Reputation: 34059
Quote:
Originally Posted by BentBow View Post
Is that what you do?
This man has character witnesses that tell a much different story than you wish to paint.
Then bring em on, let's hear from the character witnesses...
 
Old 02-08-2016, 07:28 PM
 
Location: North Pacific
15,754 posts, read 7,600,694 times
Reputation: 2576
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuebald View Post
The government never intended to use violence until the were forced into it. Finicum fought the Law, and the Law won. That will forever be his epitaph.


The cooler heads in the two vehicles are still alive because they knew what would happen if they went for their guns. If you want to change the laws, fine. Many do. There are a lot of them I would change. But that is done by legal maneuvers in the courts and through the voting booth, not by armed thugs hijacking a government building and issuing demands. We are a nation of laws, designed to protect all of us. You can't just pick and choose the ones you want to obey, as the Birdhouse Boys found out.
The Birdhouse Boys, set a fire on their land, that got away from them and by accident burned some federal land, which by 'law' will land them in jail for 5 years. For whatever reason, no one seems to have a problem with this? Or is the part where some one comes along to tell me, I don't understand the situation, between the government and the ranchers.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top