Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-12-2016, 01:56 PM
 
9,981 posts, read 8,596,541 times
Reputation: 5664

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
The business is open to the public, yes? Then yeah, they pretty much do have the power to make the Christian baker make the cake.

If you can't serve the general public freely and without prejudice don't open a public business.

That is a very un-American mentality.

My business is MY business, not the public's.

Just like they can choose who to patronize, we used to be able to choose who to serve.

It's called freedom of assembly and association.

The only case I would support a ban on discrimination in private business
is in life-threatening matters such as security or health.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2016, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,237,301 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by MordinSolus View Post
This is such a silly, nonsensical argument. It costs the cake maker nothing to do his job, but it costs the customer their dignity if the cake maker refuses to take the customer's money. There is no law that says you are allowed to discriminate for whatever reason you want, and there is no passage in the Bible that says "Thou shalt not bake cakes for the gays." It's just plain intolerance and there's no way around that. And tolerating intolerance isn't tolerance. It's cowardice.

And would you be making this argument if a baker was turning away Christians or white people rather than gays?
There is no law that says everyone around you is required to protect your dignity.

And baker's refusal to bake the cake is because he is against gay marriage... NOT GAY PEOPLE... gay marriage.

But nevermind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 01:59 PM
 
1,824 posts, read 1,372,616 times
Reputation: 1569
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Cakes are not part of the wedding ceremony. Bakers are not part of the wedding ceremony.
Man, you people REEEALLY are splitting hairs here.
Cakes are part of the gay wedding or any wedding for that matter. If they were not, there would be no story here, no issue.

The baker does not want to P A R T I C I P A T E in a gay wedding because of his religious beliefs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 01:59 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,757,033 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjrose View Post
Cakes are not part of the wedding ceremony. Bakers are not part of the wedding ceremony.
That is your perspective but it is not one that the bakers who refused share.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:00 PM
 
211 posts, read 114,036 times
Reputation: 236
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
I'd say fine, thanks for letting me know, and support someone else. Someone not opposed to my "lifestyle". Much as I choose to do in other areas. I wouldn't force them to take my money. Well, unless I was feeling like a particularly entitled bully, empowered by idiotic laws.
Exactly. I prefer to know if a business is bigoted or hostile towards me or my beliefs, so I know to avoid patronizing them.

There are a great number of companies and public figures who openly state their hostility towards people with right-of-center beliefs. I'm glad they're so open about it, so I can avoid giving them money.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:01 PM
 
26,660 posts, read 13,757,033 times
Reputation: 19118
Quote:
Originally Posted by MordinSolus View Post
This is such a silly, nonsensical argument. It costs the cake maker nothing to do his job, but it costs the customer their dignity if the cake maker refuses to take the customer's money.

Except that it would cost the baker to compromise his ethics and morals to provide the cake.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Middle of nowhere
24,260 posts, read 14,217,920 times
Reputation: 9895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
Baking the cake and providing it for use in the event is a contribution to the event. Period.

And being black isn't a choice. That's why it's illegal to discriminate on the basis of color. Getting married IS a choice... not a natural condition of birth. It's an entirely different category.

Why is this so hard for so many?
The cake is not part of the wedding ceremony. It is not even seen until after the couple are married. The cake is not in the church, or pushed down the aisle. It is not required to be there for the couple to get married. It is served at the reception.

Being gay isn't a choice. But religion is, and you can not refuse service to someone based on their religious beliefs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Hougary, Texberta
9,019 posts, read 14,297,131 times
Reputation: 11032
Either you are tolerant or you are not.


It's not a street, it's not a continuum, it's a yes or no answer.


If you can't see how these new laws run contrary to tolerance, you will find yourselves with these fine gentlemen here, on the wrong side of history.


Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:03 PM
 
1,824 posts, read 1,372,616 times
Reputation: 1569
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tyster View Post
And baker's refusal to bake the cake is because he is against gay marriage... NOT GAY PEOPLE... gay marriage.
This is what liberals and the politically correct cannot seem to comprehend.
This also completely vindicates the point of the original post, that tolerance IS a one way street among the left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2016, 02:04 PM
 
Location: Secure Bunker
5,461 posts, read 3,237,301 times
Reputation: 5269
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaymondChandlerLives View Post
The business is open to the public, yes? Then yeah, they pretty much do have the power to make the Christian baker make the cake.

If you can't serve the general public freely and without prejudice don't open a public business.

So do you have the right to go into a Jewish bakery and demand a cake with a huge swastika on it? Under your rules he MUST make it for you, right?

Can you go into a black owned bakery and demand a cake depicting a lynching because it will be used at a KKK rally? Under your rules he MUST make it for you, right?

Yes or no?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:55 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top