Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Can Regular Cannabis Users be Professional, Productive Members of Society?
No 46 15.38%
Yes 202 67.56%
Yes, but only a small percentage can pull it off 31 10.37%
The question has too many factors to give an accurate answer 16 5.35%
I don't know 4 1.34%
Voters: 299. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-30-2016, 08:29 PM
 
32,071 posts, read 15,072,790 times
Reputation: 13691

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Nah. Stoners only think they are doing well. Everyone else is laughing at them.

Pot gradually erodes your decision making ability and in the end, you're just a pothead. Nothing more.

Like I said in the other thread....I know many professionals who smoke pot daily. They don't smoke it do get high. They smoke it to treat aliments such as anxiety and pain and so on. Why are you pushing pills when a natural plant does the same thing. It obviously doesn't erode decision making since these people get up every day, go to work and make hundreds of thousands dollars a year. So why would you laugh at them
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-30-2016, 08:50 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,674,911 times
Reputation: 20886
Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchlights View Post
Hawkeye, I know that you addressed this to someone else, but I must ask.... Do you believe a person can be a regular (or occasional) user, yet come to work sober during the course of their job?

This question applies to alcohol use as well. Just because someone smokes (or drinks) in the evening after work doesn't mean they show up stoned (or under the influence) the next day at work.

I know many stoners don't care and are indifferent to this, but there are many responsible users (or people who would like to enjoy the benefits of marijuana) that are respectful of the laws that govern.

"Regular cannabis user" does not = being stoned at work all day.
Yes-

I feel it is like alcohol. There are those who are occasional users who can be overall functional employees. Those who are chronic users will show compromise of effort, intellectual capacity and judgement, similar to alcoholics.

It is like any sedative hypnotic (I never condone such use as a physician- 1-2 drinks of alcohol actually reduced the incidence of MI, but I won't tell people to drink). However, those who use such meds intermittantly will not suffer long term negative consequences of these drugs and will probably be able to function well on a daily basis.

Long term and frequent abuse is quite a different story. Essentially equate pot to alcohol- there are those that function with low dose and moderate use. Chronic, daily abusers do not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2016, 08:53 PM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,935,344 times
Reputation: 12440
Yes. Now the people on Rx meds..those are the ones you have to watch for.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-30-2016, 09:05 PM
 
17,273 posts, read 9,565,470 times
Reputation: 16468
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
Yes-

I feel it is like alcohol. There are those who are occasional users who can be overall functional employees. Those who are chronic users will show compromise of effort, intellectual capacity and judgement, similar to alcoholics.

It is like any sedative hypnotic (I never condone such use as a physician- 1-2 drinks of alcohol actually reduced the incidence of MI, but I won't tell people to drink). However, those who use such meds intermittantly will not suffer long term negative consequences of these drugs and will probably be able to function well on a daily basis.

Long term and frequent abuse is quite a different story. Essentially equate pot to alcohol- there are those that function with low dose and moderate use. Chronic, daily abusers do not.
Uh huh...you "feel". Opposite of you "know". You a physician? Lol, totally laughable. Nice attempt though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 12:04 AM
 
Location: TUS/PDX
7,825 posts, read 4,568,735 times
Reputation: 8856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Listener2307 View Post
Nah. Stoners only think they are doing well. Everyone else is laughing at them.
Not altogether different than a post such as this...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 02:13 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,896,568 times
Reputation: 11259
I would say, with the exception of jobs where unimpaired short term memory is a must, yes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 12:49 PM
 
4,921 posts, read 7,692,780 times
Reputation: 5482
Cannabis is not addictive.
However, like all things it can be overdone.
Society should be more concerned with grandma's OC and all the benzos available in most households today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 12:55 PM
 
Location: Newport Beach, California
39,232 posts, read 27,618,080 times
Reputation: 16072
Yes Like Willie Nelson


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwYS66Gbhwk
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 12:59 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,384,306 times
Reputation: 73937
Define regular.

Define productive.

If it's like weekly or more, I'd say you'd have to be one of a verrrrrrrry select few.

Do I think any random person could smoke out every few months or whatever and still be a productive professional?
Probably. But several professional licenses would have you out on your ass if you were caught.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2016, 01:01 PM
 
Location: Texas
44,259 posts, read 64,384,306 times
Reputation: 73937
Quote:
Originally Posted by thefragile View Post
Uh huh...you "feel". Opposite of you "know". You a physician? Lol, totally laughable. Nice attempt though.
You don't like what he said so you question his credentials? Nice.
And so typical.
I'm a doc and agree with him.
I'm staring at an electronic greaseboard with several 'productive' drug users on it right this very second.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top