Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: should have we come to Saudi Arabia's defense?
yes 3 23.08%
no 10 76.92%
other 0 0%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:35 PM
 
Location: USA
31,085 posts, read 22,101,630 times
Reputation: 19101

Advertisements

Knowing what we know now and the expansion of Radical Wahhabist based Islam out of Saudi Arabia, should have we intervened? Saddam may have been easier to deal with in hindsight?

People on the Left and Right seem to agree that Wahhabism is at the root of Radical Islam. Is this really the case?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:37 PM
 
Location: In the reddest part of the bluest state
5,752 posts, read 2,784,113 times
Reputation: 4925
You mean Kuwait?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Arizona
2,559 posts, read 2,220,712 times
Reputation: 3921
Kuwait was incidental. We wanted to insure that the flow of oil was uninterrupted.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:46 PM
 
4,899 posts, read 3,556,787 times
Reputation: 4471
for anyone who thinks for a second we did this because of anything other than our interest in oil, funny stuff!

that is a cause worthy of protection. and if you don't think it is, I challenge you to never drive, fly or buy anything that was once transported.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:50 PM
 
Location: Bel Air, California
23,766 posts, read 29,074,074 times
Reputation: 37337
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater View Post
Kuwait was incidental. We wanted to insure that the flow of oil was uninterrupted.

the flow of Kuwait oil to Saudi Arabia? I figured they had plenty of their own.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,481,895 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by LS Jaun View Post
...

People on the Left and Right seem to agree that Wahhabism is at the root of Radical Islam. Is this really the case?
But the oil...so, that's not an issue.

[let's be reasonable]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 01:58 PM
 
Location: Arizona
2,559 posts, read 2,220,712 times
Reputation: 3921
Saudi Arabia was right in Saddam's line of sight (and indeed, I think a border skirmish or two was fought on their territory). We weren't taking any chances.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 02:03 PM
 
Location: Phoenix, AZ
7,184 posts, read 4,770,186 times
Reputation: 4869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater View Post
Kuwait was incidental. We wanted to insure that the flow of oil was uninterrupted.
Kuwait was the official reason for staging operations in Saudi. The Bushes set Saddam up. Once we "liberated" Kuwait, we just had to stay in Saudi. We have a tendency to stay in places we have fought.

No, we should not have stayed in Saudi. That was a HUGE mistake
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 02:05 PM
 
Location: In the reddest part of the bluest state
5,752 posts, read 2,784,113 times
Reputation: 4925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slater View Post
Saudi Arabia was right in Saddam's line of sight (and indeed, I think a border skirmish or two was fought on their territory). We weren't taking any chances.
The Saudis sided with Iraq in in the Iran/Iraq war. Only after they invasion of Kuwait did they become hostile towards Baghdad.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-23-2016, 03:01 PM
 
Location: USA
31,085 posts, read 22,101,630 times
Reputation: 19101
Quote:
Originally Posted by MIKEETC View Post
But the oil...so, that's not an issue.

[let's be reasonable]
Of course, oil and our agreements to defend our allies were why we were there. The us having troops on the ground in Saudi Arabia was one of the main reasons Osama bin Laden sent his minions to attack us.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top