Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Is the Islamification of small town USA a good thing
Yes, and you're wrong to even ask. 34 28.33%
No, and I fear America will die. 86 71.67%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 120. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 08-07-2016, 04:46 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,649,482 times
Reputation: 13169

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taratova View Post
Don't forget the years Bill Clinton was in , the talk was that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and the inspectors were no longer allowed to check for those weapons.. Clinton administration stated over and over that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction and had to be taken out.
Just a few quotes. there were many more.

Democrat Quotes on Iraq


Weapons of Mass Destruction


Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade and much of his nation's wealth not on providing for the Iraqi people but on developing nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
-- President Bill Clinton (State of the Union Address), Jan. 27, 1998


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998


Can you dig up a quote from Bill Clinton saying Iraq has weapons of mass destruction?

The quotes you referenced were basically to try to scare Hussein. I don't recall Clinton proclaiming that Iraq had WMDs...

...but Bush did! Bush lied.

 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:00 PM
 
4,019 posts, read 3,953,588 times
Reputation: 2938
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
In the interest of precision, that's a press nickname. The actual name was the "Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002" or AUMF, and it authorized the President to make the decision to use military force if needed.
Who cares if they had WMDs. Many countries have WMDs including nukes, gas and biological weapons in their possession including the US, China, North Korea, Russia etc are you going to invade every one of them? The only legitimate reason to invade Iraq was if Iraq used those weapons on AMERICAN CITIZENS on US soil. 1) they never used those weapons against us or even had them in their possession and 2) so what if they did have them? Unless they have a modern blue water navy and long range air force to deliver those weapons it poses a zero threat to anyone in the west.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
That being said - the pro-war propaganda job was extremely impressive, and it took more backbone than most could muster to speak up against war. As for WMD, while the extent and number of programs were clearly made up, I think most expected to find something. And with Fox news <spat> ready to carry the administration's water, a dozen rifle bullets dipped in Windex could have been spun into vindication.
And Hillary played a large role in disseminating the pro-war propaganda. The Bush admin had plenty of help from Fox News, the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN as well as democrats like Hillary Clinton in spreading its propaganda and lies.

The job of the congress is look at the facts, not fall for the lamest and transparent propaganda. Polling shows about half of Americans were opposed to the IWR at the time. And yet their leaders voted in favor of it. What is the purpose of having leaders that are dumber than the average citizen? The answer is they are not dumb, just evil.
 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:08 PM
 
46,963 posts, read 25,998,208 times
Reputation: 29449
Quote:
Originally Posted by cisco kid View Post
Who cares if they had WMDs. Many countries have WMDs including nukes, gas and biological weapons in their possession including the US, China, North Korea, Russia etc are you going to invade every one of them? The only legitimate reason to invade Iraq was if Iraq used those weapons on AMERICAN CITIZENS on US soil. 1) they never used those weapons against us and 2) so what if they have them? Unless they have a modern blue water navy and long range air force to deliver those weapons to North America it poses zero threat anyone in the west.
You're preaching to the choir - I tried like hell to convince people that the Iraq War was a fool's errand. Turns out you can't dissuade people once they've decided that they really, really want to shove their genitals in the garbage compactor.

Quote:
The job of the congress is look at the facts, not fall for the lamest and transparent propaganda. Polling shows about half of Americans were opposed to the IWR at the time.
Was it that high? Honest question. Because it sure as all out felt as if the populace had a bad case of War Fever.

Quote:
The answer is they are not dumb, just evil.
Could be both. Many were just cowards, going along to get along and thinking it couldn't be that bad. The Gulf War had left people, influential people too, with the impression that war could be fought fast, easy and cheap.
 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:08 PM
 
9,981 posts, read 8,593,450 times
Reputation: 5664
Islam did not start taking over Turkey until 800 years after it was founded.

Within a few short centuries of gaining a foothold...


https://oneway2day.files.wordpress.c...rkey-chart.jpg
 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:20 PM
 
1,824 posts, read 1,722,027 times
Reputation: 1378
So, would the US have no people left besides Muslims?


Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Oh, yeah, that's a great answer.

I guess you don't realize that they seek to destroy ALL of Western civilization, and especially the United States. And they are doing it, too.

Ever here of "civilization jihad?"
 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:22 PM
 
1,824 posts, read 1,722,027 times
Reputation: 1378
So, in 600 years they'll make us all Muslims?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowball7 View Post
Islam did not start taking over Turkey until 800 years after it was founded.

Within a few short centuries of gaining a foothold...


https://oneway2day.files.wordpress.c...rkey-chart.jpg
 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:28 PM
 
1,824 posts, read 1,722,027 times
Reputation: 1378
Hispanics are expected to be a majority in 2050. So how long will it take Muslims to be the new majority?


Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Todd View Post
It is only a matter of time before the invasion has reached a critical mass.

I think it is a real shame that the world is losing its personal identity and the US is a prime example of that. We have long been the great melting pot of the world and we have been enriched by immigrants (legal) from all over the world but that was when people wanted to assimilate. Today immigrants don't even need to learn english because the goverment is giving them everything they need. If you want to get a drivers license you can take it in spanish. If you need information press 2 for spanish.

There is no reason for them to assimilate and this goes for muslims too. There will come a time when they become a majority in an area and vote one of their own into power.
The biggest problem is not muslims but their faith that considers any non muslim an infidel. When they gain political power will they be able to change laws and change America?
 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:33 PM
 
4,095 posts, read 2,566,254 times
Reputation: 3973
Quote:
Originally Posted by GJJG2012 View Post
Hispanics are expected to be a majority in 2050. So how long will it take Muslims to be the new majority?
One is an ethnicity, other an ideology, two different things. There is overlap between the two as well.
 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:40 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,477,038 times
Reputation: 10343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowball7 View Post
Do we really want Arabs and Mosques popping up all over small town USA ?
Want? No. But this is a free country where religion is protected under the 1st Amendment so...

[shrug]
 
Old 08-07-2016, 05:41 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,142,126 times
Reputation: 13661
It's time to stop importing any more people in general.

There are already more than enough Americans who need work.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:36 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top