Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-13-2016, 07:06 PM
 
19,966 posts, read 7,876,419 times
Reputation: 6556

Advertisements

I think, Ivanka attractive and charming as she is, is being allowed to push her female-centric and feminist view too much. I sort of understand why Trump is allowing it to go forward. Some people have to be pander too based on their identity group.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-13-2016, 07:10 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,264,758 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by mtl1 View Post
I think, Ivanka attractive and charming as she is, is being allowed to push her female-centric and feminist view too much. I sort of understand why Trump is allowing it to go forward. Some people have to be pander too based on their identity group.
I do think Trump is pandering for votes, but he's not that conservative, so I wouldn't be surprised if he really believes in this proposal. I have no way to tell one way or the other with Trump though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 07:12 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,892,870 times
Reputation: 11259
More proof that Trump is no conservative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 07:17 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by tickyul View Post
I know Trump is pretty much fitting the Phonycon mold.

But yeah, the idea of Hillary appointing two or three to SCOTUS, yikes!

Trump is a big-government dude......more goodies for the peeps is popular among all politicians.

Neither Hillary or Trump will appoint anyone to the SCOTUS.

POTUS nominates.
The Senate either confirms or rejects.


BTW, a Democrat Congress confirmed Scalia.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 07:19 PM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,892,870 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by middle-aged mom View Post

BTW, a Democrat Congress confirmed Scalia.
A different era. Politics changed when Obamacare went through on a pure partisan vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 07:24 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,748,172 times
Reputation: 20674
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happiness-is-close View Post
I love watching the republican platform collapse. Prior to trump this idea would have been called anti-business socialism.
It will still be called that by many members of Congress who are more interested in Entitlement ( SS and Medicare) reform which Trump seems to oppose, for now.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 07:42 PM
 
Location: Midwest
1,540 posts, read 1,125,454 times
Reputation: 2542
Quote:
Originally Posted by crone View Post
Does Trump already do this at his places of employment?

He is pandering. If he is elected it will never happen.

Ivanka was just asked this by Megyn Kelly on the Kelly File and yes he does and so does she in her business.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 07:49 PM
 
14,489 posts, read 6,100,100 times
Reputation: 6842
He has to do something to make the Republican Party more appealing to millennials and to women

Even as a tax write off, this would mean that other taxpayers would be making up the tax shortfall that's created. Also, just think of the oversight and regulation that this would require to ensure that it operates efficiently and fairly, without con artists taking advantage of a program like this. The idea is is inconsistent for someone who's in favor of less regulation.

Even with, or without tax dollars going to support this, to whatever degree, it would jeopardize the financial stability of small companies. This is idealism worthy of Bernie Sanders. It shows
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 09:06 PM
 
1,710 posts, read 1,463,521 times
Reputation: 2205
Quote:
Originally Posted by dashrendar4454 View Post
He has to do something to make the Republican Party more appealing to millennials and to women

Even as a tax write off, this would mean that other taxpayers would be making up the tax shortfall that's created. Also, just think of the oversight and regulation that this would require to ensure that it operates efficiently and fairly, without con artists taking advantage of a program like this. The idea is is inconsistent for someone who's in favor of less regulation.

Even with, or without tax dollars going to support this, to whatever degree, it would jeopardize the financial stability of small companies. This is idealism worthy of Bernie Sanders. It shows
Im not sure it would be too much of a burden on taxes. I think the budget needs to be examined with an ax not a pen...a program like this is fine. The rest of the world does it. I see families where the wife takes 2 weeks off for a new born then back at work, baby at daycare all day. Kid grows up to be a disrespectful a hole an we wonder why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-13-2016, 09:21 PM
 
21,480 posts, read 10,579,563 times
Reputation: 14129
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
Sounds like he could be pandering to women for their vote, or he actually is in favor of this, or this is just another empty promise, or some combination thereof. I just find it interesting because conservatives usually oppose policies like this, not that I consider Trump to be conservative, but some of his supporters are on the record saying that Trump is conservative.
I suspect he actually is in favor of this, though I wonder if he has this policy in his own corporation. I think they should rename it family leave and allow both men and women to take paid time off. It doesn't have to be six weeks though. That seems a little too long. Most people, especially men, wouldn't take it.

When my kids were still in daycare, my husband and I would alternate days to take off if one of the babies were sick. My boss was very understanding, but my husband's boss asked my husband why couldn't his wife stay home. He had to explain to him that I also had a job.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:37 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top