Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Federal law does not require Trump to divest his holdings or to sever his ties to his businesses, and the president is not subject to conflict-of-interest rules that govern his Cabinet and other members of the executive branch.
Should President Trump divest his business holdings? Why or why not?
Last edited by Corvette Ministries; 12-14-2016 at 08:41 AM..
Location: Foothills of Maryland Blue Ridge mountains
993 posts, read 767,353 times
Reputation: 3163
Trump will do what is in his best financial interest, he isn't concerned about anything else but Trump. He isn't concerned with appearances. He's the President and republicans control every facet of our government. He can do whatever he wants and he will
Most who are writing or reading here expect to live for at least 30+ more years. Will you agree to change tradition (which was based on national experience in the political arena) for America from now on. Is it wise to never be shown tax records for the rest of your life is the question I would expect older generations would know better.
Federal law does not require Trump to divest his holdings or to sever his ties to his businesses, and the president is not subject to conflict-of-interest rules that govern his Cabinet and other members of the executive branch.
Should President Trump divest his business holdings? Why or why not?
I think the exception is his hotel in DC because of his lease with the GSA had a stipulation about it.
I have to ask... did George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, or John Adams, relinquish theirs?
NO. He should not be forced to divest or relinquish anything. It is just more identity politics and virtue signaling BS, the social justice warriors feed on.
I have to ask... did George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, or John Adams, relinquish theirs?
NO. He should not be forced to divest or relinquish anything. It is just more identity politics and virtue signaling BS, the social justice warriors feed on.
They didn't even use Air Force One. They were true patriots.
No. He should keep everything and spend the next 4 years defending himself against claims he violated the Emoluments Clause. Keep him busy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
