Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
1) All these debates are hot air. Most reporters agreed that Hillary won, yet it didn't change Trump supporters opinion. It didn't matter what had been said, including recordings of Trump himself talking like a retard. Bottom line - even if Hillary had any advantage it didn't matter.
2) What cheating are you referring to?
3) If the GOP had been hacked by an unfriendly foreign power - all hell would breake lose. I can only imagine the outrage in the name of national security and American pride.
1. I have no idea what you are trying to say. "Most reporters agreed Hillary won"? Not on my planet.
2. Hillary cheated by having the debate questions, provided by Donna Brazil who got them from CNN somehow. Seriously? You ask "what cheating?" WTH.....
3. I don't disagree, of course the GOP would be angry. I frankly don't care however if the dems or repubs are mad over having their cheating exposed.
No one is confused, although I understand why the far right wants that to be the story.
"Interfered" with the election, "influenced" the election, "Hacked" the election all refers to Russia hacking for the purpose of installing the candidate of its choice.
Gee, the pollsters shouldda consulted Putin.
At the time of the alleged "hack," nobody expected Trump to be the nominee.
1. I have no idea what you are trying to say. "Most reporters agreed Hillary won"? Not on my planet.
2. Hillary cheated by having the debate questions, provided by Donna Brazil who got them from CNN somehow. Seriously? You ask "what cheating?" WTH.....
3. I don't disagree, of course the GOP would be angry. I frankly don't care however if the dems or repubs are mad over having their cheating exposed.
As I said, since all the debates made little difference, Donna Brazil revealing the questions before wasn't a decisive factor, although it clearly was wrong doing.
I don't think we should accept any foreign power to "reveal" any party or candidate emails or strategy. That includes the republicans and democrats in congress and senate. It is an internal matter. Why should Putin (or China) impact the US elections?
(I also don't understand this guys Assange - as a non US citizen, what's does he want?)
Someone tried to hack the Republican email servers too but couldn't. Their security was too good.
That's not clear.
"Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, “It’s important to note, Wolf, that they have not only hacked into the DNC but also into the RNC….the Russians have basically hacked into both parties at the national level, and that gives us all concern about what their motivations are.” Several days later, McCaul said that he misspoke."Did Russia Hack the RNC Too? Here
"Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Texas, told CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, “It’s important to note, Wolf, that they have not only hacked into the DNC but also into the RNC….the Russians have basically hacked into both parties at the national level, and that gives us all concern about what their motivations are.” Several days later, McCaul said that he misspoke."Did Russia Hack the RNC Too? Here
CNN is clueless. Time and time again, the RNC was not hacked and CNN ignores this fact while they sell their commercials to unsuspected viewers.
I have no idea what my comment has to do with the electoral college. My guess is that you are using it as a segue to avoid talking about the subject which was Michael McCaul's statement to CNN
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.